Search

Khilji comments on the anonymous emails I received as being weird


I received an interesting comment today that is worth thinking about but because of its general nature relating to comments and emails that I receive daily much of which I ignore but on this ocassion the comments are relevant and I decided that we should devote ourselves to addressing the issues in this special blogpost instead of where it was posted:

It was as follows:

[Shantanu Panigrahi’s Blog] Please moderate: “Anonymous email concerning my citizenship received” Shopping WordPress To shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk 29 Jan 2018 at 14:24

New comment waiting approval on Shantanu Panigrahi’s Blog Khilji commented on Anonymous email concerning my citizenship received I received the following anonymous email yesterday and I am assuming it is again from an agent of the UK State representing the … Mr Panigrahi, You are an interesting fellow. Either you were the author, or you must have become aware of –} http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5765189 (“Victim of an internet crank Shantanu Panigrahi affecting job-hunting”) I think you will get many new visitors to your site because of that article, because Moneysaving Expert site has has many readers. The article gives advice on anonposting or anonmailing and even directs readers to –} https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2017/12/27/correspondence-with-her-majestys-passport-office-concerning-the-validity-of-my-uk-passport/#comments (“List of 440 bodies or persons said Panigrahi is “suing, considering or threatening to sue, calling for the police to arrest or filing official or other complaints about” presented by a M.K.Bakhri MSc) After this, are you surprised you receive weird communications? Can you please explain the reference to a dog? Have you considered the possibility that the reason for having a dog would be that it would do better than you at managing your affairs? From their site, where all Court of Justice of the European Union correspondence is reproduced, there is no “emailed letter” to you “dated 29 January 2018” but there is one dated 28 January. Put plainly, it tells you to stop bothering them with absurdities and to go away and never come back. Is that the one you refer to? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/profiles/3453978/Profile-Mr-Justice-Eady-defender-of-the-nations-privacy.html Approve Trash | Mark as Spam

More information about Khilji URL: Email: Dfdgr@fggg.com Whois: http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/51.15.86.162 (IP: 51.15.86.162)

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

Reply Reply to All Forward More.

Comments: I have seen the website calling me a crank, from my point of view totally unjustifiably, so I invite the writer to express his concerns directly to me here so that I can deal with the issues. For the record, I have never applied for asylum in Pakistan or for its citizenship, nor have I indicated ever that I was suing or threatening to sue 440 bodies so I do not know what this reference to the Bakhri character is all about. Perhaps Khilji can explain? He certainly appears to have done his homework.

As far as my communications with the Court of Justice of the European Union is concerned, I do not read these in the same way as Khilji does. There is no doubt that that the matter under investigation is receiving due attention. I do not know about the 28 January letter from the Court, all the details of materials exchanged are given here: https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2018/01/09/clarification-for-my-travel-to-greece-sought-from-the-greek-embassy-in-london/.

January 29, 2018 Posted by shantanup | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Tribunal General de La Union Europea

CVRIA Luxembourg

31/01/2018

By email: shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk

Dear Sir

The Registrar of the General Court acknowledges receipt of your emails of 27/01/2018 and 29/01/2018.

Your attention is once again drawn to the fact that the General Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes between individuals (natural or legal persons) and institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union.

However, the General Court does not have jurisdiction to review the decisions of national courts or tribunals, or to rule on the lawfulness of provisions, decisions or measures adopted by national authorities of a Member State. Nor does the General Court have jurisdiction to hear and determine actions brought against decisions taken by international bodies which are not within the institutional system of the European Union, such as the European Court of Human Rights.

Furthermore, in order to bring an action that is within the jurisdiction of the General Court, the applicant must be represented by a lawyer authorised to practise in a Member State. An application which is not signed by a lawyer cannot be registered.

Having regard to the above considerations, the Registrar regrets to inform you that the General Court can take no action on your letter.

The Registrar also informs you that he reserves the right, at his discretion, no longer to reply to your letters having the same subject-matter in the absence of new facts.

E. Coulon

Registrar


From HM Courts and Tribunals Service

The Royal Courts of Justice Group

High Court Appeals Office

Room WG08

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London WC 2A 2 LL

Our Ref: CORRESPONDENCE/DJ

26 January 2018


Dear Sir/Madam,

Re: PANIGRAHI (APP) v ? (RES)

Thank you for your email dated 25 January 2018.

This office would not know of any investigation being conducted by a Mr Justice Eadey.

Yours faithfully

D Jenkins

Appeals Office


Appeal Progress: Re PANIGRAHI (APP) V ? (RES); High Court Claim No: HQ17X01773

Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To

Jenkins David (Appeal Court)

31 Jan 2018 at 11:17

To

Appeals Office

HM Courts and Tribunals Service

The Royal Courts of Justice Group

High Court Appeals Office

Room WG08

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London WC2A 2 LL


Your Reference: CORRESPONDENCE/DJ



Dear Mr Jenkins


1. Thank you for your letter dated 26 January 2018 that I have just received.


2. It would appear that the information I was given at my website was erroneous. Notwithstanding I am anxious that this Appeal should proceed to a Hearing. Please let me know the reason for the delay.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom



Reply Reply to All Forward More


Your letter from the General Court

Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To

GC Registry

31 Jan 2018 at 11:51

To

Registry of the General Court of the European Union

Rue du Fort Niedergrunewald

L- 2925 Luxembourg


Dear E Coulon


1. Thank you for your email this morning and the attachment letter dated 31 January 2018 sent from the Registrar of the General Court.


2. I forward to you my email to the High Court's Appeals Court of the United Kingdom which did not receive a written reply. This shows that I have done all I could to progress this matter through the national court and other institutional systems of the United Kingdom as narrated in my website: https://shantanup.wordpress.com/.


3. Your letter is therefore totally unacceptable as these are new up-to-date facts that the General Court should have taken into consideration in determining this Case.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom


On Wednesday, 31 January 2018, 11:17, Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: on Fw: Appeal Progress: Re PANIGRAHI (APP) V ? (RES); High Court Claim No: HQ17X01773


To

Appeals Office

HM Courts and Tribunals Service

The Royal Courts of Justice Group

High Court Appeals Office

Room WG08

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London WC2A 2 LL


Your Reference: CORRESPONDENCE/DJ



Dear Mr Jenkins


1. Thank you for your letter dated 26 January 2018 that I have just received.


2. It would appear that the information I was given at my website was erroneous. Notwithstanding I am anxious that this Appeal should proceed to a Hearing. Please let me know the reason for the delay.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom




Reply Reply to All Forward More


CMP-069454 Legal Ombudsman ABC:03471150 (2)

Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To

Monneka Tahir

31 Jan 2018 at 12:14

To

Monneka Tahir

Whiterose Blackmans Solicitors LLP

p: 0113 216 5507 f: 0113 216 5508

a: Fryers House, 146 Cardigan Road, Leeds, LS6 1LU

w: www.whiteroseblackmans.co.uk e: monneka.tahir@whiteroseblackmans.co.uk



Dear Ms Tahir


Please let me know immediately whether I will receive your final response to my complaint registered against you with the Legal Ombudsman as required below, or I will have to request the Legal Ombudsman to look into this complaint immediately without waiting for your response.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom


On Wednesday, 31 January 2018, 12:01, Enquiries <Enquiries@Legalombudsman.org.uk> wrote:


Dear Dr Panigrahi,


Thank you for your email received on 11 January 2018.


As per our email of 28 December 2017 please note that we can only consider complaints that have been made to Whiterose Blackmans Solicitors LLP, allowing them eight weeks to provide you a final response in writing. As such the firm have eight weeks to provide a final response to your complaint of 28 December 2017.


If you receive a final response you are unhappy with, or do not receive one within eight weeks, please send us:

· A copy of their final response (if received)

· If you have not received a response within eight weeks we will need some proof the complaint was received by the firm. Such as a recorded delivery slip or an email previously received from the email address you sent the complaint to.

Please only send us copies and not original documents.


We also need you to complete and return our enclosed complaint form. This will allow us to ensure your complaint falls within our jurisdiction.


Please be aware that we cannot complete the assessment of your case until we receive the above from you. As such our investigation has not yet commenced.


Yours sincerely Assessment Centre Legal Ombudsman Telephone: 0300 555 0333 www.legalombudsman.org.uk



· Download

Complaint Form Legal .pdf

Reply Reply to All Forward More


CMP-069454 Legal Ombudsman ABC:03471150 (3)

Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To

Enquiries

31 Jan 2018 at 12:38


Dear Sir


Please confirm that I have up to 6 months from 28 February 2018 within which to consider whether to lodge an official complaint.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi


On Wednesday, 31 January 2018, 12:01, Enquiries <Enquiries@Legalombudsman.org.uk> wrote:


Dear Dr Panigrahi,


Thank you for your email received on 11 January 2018.


As per our email of 28 December 2017 please note that we can only consider complaints that have been made to Whiterose Blackmans Solicitors LLP, allowing them eight weeks to provide you a final response in writing. As such the firm have eight weeks to provide a final response to your complaint of 28 December 2017.


If you receive a final response you are unhappy with, or do not receive one within eight weeks, please send us:

· A copy of their final response (if received)

· If you have not received a response within eight weeks we will need some proof the complaint was received by the firm. Such as a recorded delivery slip or an email previously received from the email address you sent the complaint to.

Please only send us copies and not original documents.


We also need you to complete and return our enclosed complaint form. This will allow us to ensure your complaint falls within our jurisdiction.


Please be aware that we cannot complete the assessment of your case until we receive the above from you. As such our investigation has not yet commenced.


Yours sincerely Assessment Centre Legal Ombudsman Telephone: 0300 555 0333 www.legalombudsman.org.uk



Reply Reply to All Forward More

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Information Received - Review Letter - OTP-CR-76/22 Inbox from: OTP InformationDesk <OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int> to: "shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com" <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> date:

Your Reference: 22/444/CM/PCC Yahoo / Sent Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com> To: civil.claims@kent.pnn.police.uk Tue, 10 May at 20:22 To Civil Claim Officers Thank you for this morning'