Continuing struggle to prove my sanity
On the morning of 24 May 2016 I was feeling vulnerable that I did not have legal proceedings ongoing so that I could still be attacked by the NHS so sent the following email to the Administrative Court:
Challenging the High Court's (Administrative Court) decision on NHS invasion of privacy
Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>
To
Case Progression Administrative Court Office
24 May 2016 at 7:22
To
The Administrative Court
The Royal Courts of Justice
Royal Courts of Justice,
London WC2A 2LL
Dear Sir
1. I wish to challenge the decision of the Administrative Court that I have not made a justiciable application to test the legality of the following letter that I have received from the NHS:
Kent and Medway NHS NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust Medway Community Mental Health Team Canada House Barnsole Road Gillingham Kent ME7 4 JL Tel: 01634 583000 Fax: 01634 583029
Our Ref: FUappt/grb Date: 13.5.16
This letter is confidential to the addressee(s) and person to whom it refers. Please do not disclose to a third party without reference to the originating service. PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Mr S Panigrahi 3 Hoath Way Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL
Dear Mr Panigrahi
Please be advised that a home visit appointment has been made for you with the Medway Community Mental Health Team as follows:
Date: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 Time: 12.30 p.m With: Dr A Emezie, Specialty doctor and Dr R. Patel, GP Venue: 3 Hoath Way, Wigmore Gillingham
Please allow 45 minutes for this appointment.
If this appointment is inconvenient please do not hesitate to contact us on 1634 583000 to arrange a more suitable time.
Yours sincerely
Gill Banister Administrator Medway Community Mental Health Team
Cc Dr. R. Patel, Wigmore Medical Centre, 114 Woodside Gillingham ME8 0PW
Chairman – Andrew Ling Chief Exectutive – Angela McNab
Trust Headquarters: Farm Villa, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone, Kent ME16 9PH Tel 01622 724100 Fax: 01622 724167
2. Please let me have leave to take the matter to the Court of Appeal.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
Reply Reply to All Forward More
No reply came by 11.00 am. By midafternoon the State organized an email from the Mental Health Tribunal instead. I waited to see if anything would come from the Surgery, the High Court or the Community Mental Health Team or even the Police for that matter before replying to this email as none came:
LETTER FROM KENT AND MEDWAY NHS: THEIR REF: FUappt/grb (10)
Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>
To
25 May 2016 at 7:14
Dear Sir
1. Thank you for your email.
2. I have not received any further responses whether written or verbal from the Wigmore Medical Centre and nor the Medway Community Mental Health Team concerning this matter so that the attached letter from the NHS (PanigrahicomplaintresponseDrReemaPatelWigMedCentre.docx) is their final word which I hereby submit to complete all the necessary components of my Application to the Mental Health Tribunal. Please note also that my wife has now denied that she has ever been the instigator of the complaints against me to the NHS or to anyone else.
3. I should therefore be grateful for an immediate judgement.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Tuesday, 24 May 2016, 14:38, TSMH Case Progression <TSMH_Case_Progression@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr Panigrahi Thank you for your email below and please be advised that a reference number is created for each application, so once you submit an application and it is registered on to the system a reference number will be created and given to you.
Kind Regards Dilesh Name: Dilesh Morjaria Team: Case Progression Team Email: TSMHcaseprogression@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk First Tier Tribunal (Mental Health) If you wish to contact the team directly please do so via the above email address. All telephone phone queries are dealt with by our customer support team on 0300 123 2201 “I am not authorised to bind my Department contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind the Department in any way via electronic means.”
From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 22 May 2016 12:38 To: TSMH Case Progression Subject: Re: LETTER FROM KENT AND MEDWAY NHS: THEIR REF: FUappt/grb
LETTER FROM KENT AND MEDWAY NHS: THEIR REF: FUappt/grb (10)
Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>
To
25 May 2016 at 7:14
Dear Sir
1. Thank you for your email.
2. I have not received any further responses whether written or verbal from the Wigmore Medical Centre and nor the Medway Community Mental Health Team concerning this matter so that the attached letter from the NHS (PanigrahicomplaintresponseDrReemaPatelWigMedCentre.docx) is their final word which I hereby submit to complete all the necessary components of my Application to the Mental Health Tribunal. Please note also that my wife has now denied that she has ever been the instigator of the complaints against me to the NHS or to anyone else.
3. I should therefore be grateful for an immediate judgement.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Tuesday, 24 May 2016, 14:38, TSMH Case Progression <TSMH_Case_Progression@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
LETTER FROM KENT AND MEDWAY NHS: THEIR REF: FUappt/grb (11)
TSMH Case Progression <TSMH_Case_Progression@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
To
25 May 2016 at 9:59
Dear Mr Panigrahi
We have not received an application , are you wanting us to treat this letter as an application., please let us know
please look on our website for further information - https://www.gov.uk/courts-tribunals/first-tier-tribunal-mental-health
Kind Regards Chetna Patel Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunal Service - Mental Health PO BOX 8793 LE1 8BN Case Progression Officer
chetna.pateltsmh@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
DISCLAIMER I am not authorised to bind my department contractually nor to make representations or other statements which may bind the department in any any way via electronic means.
From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 25 May 2016 07:15 To: TSMH Case Progression Subject: Re: LETTER FROM KENT AND MEDWAY NHS: THEIR REF: FUappt/grb
Dear Sir
LETTER FROM KENT AND MEDWAY NHS: THEIR REF: FUappt/grb (13)
Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>
To
25 May 2016 at 10:25
Dear Sir
1. In my Application Form that was submitted electronically to you I had asked for financial compensation to be awarded to me. I have reminded you of this demand in the present correspondence and I asked you if you wanted me to resend that Application Form for ease of Reference.
2. Should I send you the previously Tribunal-approved Application Form now so that judgement is passed immediately?
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Wednesday, 25 May 2016, 7:14, Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Sir
1. Thank you for your email.
2. I have not received any further responses whether written or verbal from the Wigmore Medical Centre and nor the Medway Community Mental Health Team concerning this matter so that the attached letter from the NHS (PanigrahicomplaintresponseDrReemaPatelWigMedCentre.docx) is their final word which I hereby submit to complete all the necessary components of my Application to the Mental Health Tribunal. Please note also that my wife has now denied that she has ever been the instigator of the complaints against me to the NHS or to anyone else.
3. I should therefore be grateful for an immediate judgement.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Tuesday, 24 May 2016, 14:38, TSMH Case Progression <TSMH_Case_Progression@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
for info re: no proceedings lodged at this Court * OFFICIAL * (2)
Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>
To
Administrative Court Office, Case Progression
25 May 2016 at 12:55
Dear Ms C O'Neill
1. You are mistaken from your search of Court Records that no proceedings were lodged by me at the High Court for you must surely have a recollection of the 14 February 2016 injunction letter that I submitted to the Duty Judge at Queens Bench Division that Case Progresssion at the Administrative Court took the decision to address as official court business.
2. In this regard please note that that I have just received in the post delivered to our house a letter from Dr S Patel, Dr N. Patel and Dr R Patel of Wigmore Medical Centre 114 Woodside, Gillingham, Kent ME8 0PW Tel 01634 231752, Fax 01634 260062, dated 24 May 2015 that is set out as follows:
Mr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane, Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL
Dear Mr Panigrahi
I understand that following my response to your emailed complaint you have stopped taking your risperidone medication. Please note that I have not advised you to stop taking your medication. It is very important that you continue taking risperidone 3 mg at night on a regular basis.
I would once again like to take this opportunity to encourage you to make contact with the GP surgery to review your mental health. Please feel free to make an appointment with any GP of your preference.
Yours sincerely
(Signed)
Dr Reema Patel
3. The Mental Health Tribunal proceedings relating to the 13 May 2016 letter have now been exhausted and I am totally disatisfied with the outcome so that the Judical Review by the Administrative Court was the appropriate course of action that was applied for by me and the matter must according go to the Court of Appeal for consideration. I need to know your decision on this now so as to decide whether to resume taking risperidone medication again from tonight.
4. In the absence of a judgement from the Mental Health Tribunal and the Administrative Court's Judicial Review I would reiterate that the contents of this letter from Dr Reema Patel represents further unjustified intrusion of my privacy and must go separately before a Judge immediately.
5. In light of the error that you have made in searching Court records this morning please let me know if I should resend the Contempt of Court proceedings that I submitted and which was replied to as official Court business by Mr Iain Carr of your Court.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Wednesday, 25 May 2016, 10:34, "Administrative Court Office, Case Progression" <administrativecourtoffice.caseprogression@hmcts.x.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear Sir,
I have searched the Court’s database and I note that you have no case pending here. As such, no action can be taken on your email below, nor any correspondence be entered into in the absence of any live proceedings lodged by you here.
You may wish to seek legal advice as to any actual Court proceedings you may wish to instigate.
I trust the above points are of assisstance to you, and as there is no further action to be taken on your email, this correspondecne must now be considered closed.
Yours sincerely,
Ms C O'Neill
ACO Case Progression Officer | Administrative Court Office |Royal Courts of Justice, The Strand, London WC2A 2LL Telephone: 020 7947 6655- option 6
administrativecourtoffice.caseprogression@hmcts.x.gsi.gov.uk
Please note that replies should be sent to the email address which is used; responses should not be redirected to me individually, because Court staff cannot give the same level of priority to their individual inboxes as is given to group inboxes, which are dealt with daily.
===========
From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 24 May 2016 07:23 To: Administrative Court Office, Case Progression Subject: Challenging the High Court's (Administrative Court) decision on NHS invasion of privacy
Risperidone medication Prescription
Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>
To
26 May 2016 at 10:50
To
Kelly Mills
Practice Manager
Wigmore Medical Centre
114 Woodside
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent
ME8 0PW
Wigmore: 01634 231752
Hempstead: 01634 235531
26 May 2016
Dear Ms Mills
1. I re-authorised Phoenix Pharmacy to obtain my prescription from your Surgery for risperidone (3mg per day to be taken by me every night).
2. Can you issue the prescription today?
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
Reply Reply to All Forward More
NHS England Complaint Case C-053109: Wigmore Medical Centre & Medway Community Mental Health Team (5)
QB Issue & Enquiries <QBEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
To
27 May 2016 at 11:31
Dear Sirs,
Thank you for your email. Please provide the court with a HQ number.
Regards
D Sodipo
From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 27 May 2016 11:25 To: QB Issue & Enquiries Subject: Fw: NHS England Complaint Case C-053109: Wigmore Medical Centre & Medway Community Mental Health Team
To
Queens Bench Division
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
By Email: qbcaseman@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
For the Duty Judge
Dear Sir
Please issue civil proceedings for damages as set out in the email below and with immediate effect against the National Health Service as a satisfactory response has not been forthcoming.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Friday, 27 May 2016, 10:37, Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
To
NHS England
Dear Sir
1. Please be advised that NHS England was referred to the Court of Appeal (at the Royal Courts of Justice, London) for contempt of court with particular reference to an interference by the Medway Community Mental Health Team during your long delay in the processing of my complaint C-053109 and to which I have still not received your complaint report.
2. Please confirm that no complaint report on C-053109 will be issued by NHS England.
3. Please also send me your official postal address for court proceedings for damages that I intend to pursue against the NHS if I do not receive a satisfactory reply to this email.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
Reply Reply to All Forward More
Claim No ME002953 proceedings (2)
People
Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>
To
28 May 2016 at 7:36
To
Case Progression
Queens Bench Division
Royal Courts of Justice
London
Dear Sir
1. As required, I am providing the court with the HQ number as well as the official postal address of the National Health Service:
Customer Contact Centre
NHS England | PO Box 16738 | Redditch | B97 9PT
Tel: 0300 311 2233
Web: NHS England
Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations
Preview by Yahoo
2. Please let me know if this Case will now be determined with or without a Hearing.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Friday, 6 May 2016, 21:58, Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Ms Pender
Etc.
CONTEMPT OF COURT FOLLOWING INJUNCTION PROCEEDINGS OF 14 FEBRUARY 2016 (2)
Shan Panigrahi Dear Ms Mills 1.Thank you for your email. 2. Firstly please be advised that the 13 May 2016 letter from the Community Mental Health Team is the subject of proceedings at the High Court (Adminisrative
May 22 at 9:02 AM
Mills Kelly (NHS MEDWAY CCG) <kelly.mills1@nhs.net>
To
31 May 2016 at 11:03
Dear Mr Panigrahi,
Please find attached the response to your email from Dr R Patel.
I also note your email to me dated 26th May 2016 regarding a request for your repeat medication. As you will be aware from the out of office response you will have received I was on annual leave last week and only returned to work today. Can I please ask that all future requests for repeat medications be requested in writing to the surgery or by asking the pharmacy, I can see that you use Tony at Phoenix, to make this request for you. This will avoid any unnecessary delays to your request being processed in the event that I am away from the surgery or unable to access my emails.
Kind regards,
Kelly Mills
Practice Manager
Wigmore Medical Centre
114 Woodside
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent
ME8 0PW
Wigmore: 01634 231752
Hempstead: 01634 235531
The contents of this email are not necessarily the policy or opinion or representative of any policy or opinion of the Agency or any person employed by it. This transmission is intended only for the named recipient(s) and is confidential in nature. If received in error, please return it to the sender and destroy any copies immediately.
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
From: Shan Panigrahi [shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 22 May 2016 09:02 To: Mills Kelly (NHS MEDWAY CCG) Cc: Case Progression Administrative Court Office Subject: CONTEMPT OF COURT FOLLOWING INJUNCTION PROCEEDINGS OF 14 FEBRUARY 2016
Dear Ms Mills
ETC
Attachment:
Dr SKC Patel and Dr NR Patel Practice Manager: Mrs Kelly Mills Email: kelly.mills1@nhs.net
Wigmore Medical Centre
114 Woodside
Gillingham
Kent
ME8 0PW
Telephone: 01634 231752
Fax: 01634 260062
Branch Surgery: Hempstead Medical Centre
144 Hempstead Road
Hempstead
Kent
ME7 3QE
Telephone: 01634 235531
29th May 2016
Dear Mr Panigrahi, Thank you for your email on 25th May 2016. Please note that we have not received any official paperwork regarding an application or proceedings at the High Court. We are therefore duty bound to provide medical care to you as long as you are a registered patient of Wigmore Medical Centre. Despite having a number of different diagnoses by Psychiatrists over the years they have all agreed that you have a mental health disorder that requires treatment. You are therefore encouraged to continue taking risperidone 3mg nightly as prescribed. This is very important to prevent a relapse of your mental health condition. I note that you would like further information on why you were previously admitted to hospital. From your records, I can see that in 2004 you were referred to the Police after you tried to travel to France without the required documents. Dr. SKC Patel was not involved in you being admitted to hospital at that time. In 2008 you were sectioned again after concerns were raised to Dr. SKC Patel about your mental health. You were therefore appropriately referred to the Mental Health Team who admitted you under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act 1983. I hope that you find the response to your outstanding concerns satisfactory. Kind regards, Dr Reema Patel
High Court Proceedings on inappropriate Medical Care at Wigmore Medical Centre
Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>
To
1 June 2016 at 7:46
To
Mrs Kelly Mills
Practice Manager
Wigmore Medical Centre
114 Woodside
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0PW
Tel: 01634 231752
By Email: kelly.mills1@nhs.net
Dear Mrs Mills
1. Thank you for your email of 31 May 2016, 11.03 am.
2. Firstly, I did not receive an automatic out-of-office email response from your email address to my 26 May 2016, 10.50 am email to the Surgery. To be quite frank I find it shocking organisation that the email account that is given on letterheads as the Surgery's only email account is left unmanned when you are personally out of the office which has no doubt delayed your reply to my email of 22 May 2016, 9.02 am, until yesterday.
3. It is unfortunate that you have not received official High Court intimation of my application of the 14 February 2016 injunction and the subsequent associated proceedings. All the correct procedures needed to ensure that the matter is brought to a HIgh Court Hearing were duly followed by me through email communications culminating in my 28 May 2016 7.36 am email to the Queens Bench Divison at Case Progression on qbcaseman@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk. It is however possible that the last long weekend break due to the Bank Holiday and the Queens Birthday has delayed the High Court's consideration of the matter. If you require copies of my emailed evidence for the proceedings that I lodged at the High Court concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to get in contact with me.
4. There are a number of outstanding matters arising from the 29 May 2016 emailed letter from Dr Reema Patel that you have sent me which have not yet been resolved satisfactorily for my needs. This concerns the unexplained circumstances of my valid asylum application that was officially approved by the French Government with the appropriate document released to me to travel to France to escape from the Dr Sudhir Patel's organisation of a Mental Health Team that my wife warned me were coming to my house the same day in order to concoct my sectioning, and which the Dover Police then acted on to arrest me and take me into the hospital. You need to answer who raised the concerns about me and what those concerns were about my mental health on that occasion as well as on the occasion of 2008 episode of State-imposed incarceration that you say was 'appropriately' dealt with by Dr Sudhir Patel.
5. I appreciate that the Surgery has a duty of medical care to all its registered patients according to the Hippocratic oath, which means taking all these circumstances into account when arriving at a judgement on the diagnosis and treatment of my mental health. This you have failed to do.
6. I look forward to your reply to this email today.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
Reply Reply to All Forward More
RE: MGLA110516-0589 Form submission from: Contact us form
Mayor of London <mayor@london.gov.uk>
To
1 June 2016 at 10:12
Dear Shantanu Panigrahi Thank you for your email to the Mayor of London regarding making a complaint. Please see the link below which provides guidance on the Greater London Authority member complaints process. https://www.london.gov.uk/about-us/contacting-city-hall-and-mayor Yours sincerely Nina Miah Public Liaison Unit Submitted on Tuesday, May 10, 2016 - 2:45pm Submitted by anonymous user: 10.72.152.37 Submitted values are: First name: Shantanu Last name: Panigrahi Address: 3 Hoath Lane Postcode: Wigmore Phone number: Gillingham Email: shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk I am a: Member of the public Have you contacted us about this issue before? No I want to: Make a complaint Your message: Dear Sir I wish to know whether it is possible for a member of the public to lodge a complaint against the new Mayor Mr Sadiq Khan concerning the issue of a tweet sent from the Mayor of London Account which seemingly legitimses a threat that Islamic people pose to USA and UK if certain policies are followed. I believe that the Mayor has abused his position as Mayor of London to engage in religious politicking by his office and interference in the USA Presidential election. If such an allegation can be considered, please send me the person to whom I may email the complaint. Yours sincerely Dr Shantanu Panigrahi The results of this submission may be viewed at: https://www.london.gov.uk/node/15165/submission/15311 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message has been scanned for viruses by the Greater London Authority. Click https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/LbGvOvfUZwrGX2PQPOmvUv8Fcr8RSh1BLjFyt2ytrPi4tqwG8T8x2!wVWMRBaRHeKcG7s7DWyOFm4uq9tqSB7g== to report this email as spam. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GREATERLONDONAUTHORITY
EMAIL NOTICE: The information in this email may contain confidential or privileged materials. Please read the full email notice at http://www.london.gov.uk/email-notice
Reply Reply to All Forward More
NHS England Complaint Case C-053109: Wigmore Medical Centre & Medway Community Mental Health Team (7)
Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>
To
1 June 2016 at 16:36
Dear Mr Sodipo
The HQ number has already been provided to the Court as I understood your requirement.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Friday, 27 May 2016, 11:31, QB Issue & Enquiries <QBEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear Sirs,
Thank you for your email. Please provide the court with a HQ number.
Regards
D Sodipo
From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 27 May 2016 11:25 To: QB Issue & Enquiries Subject: Fw: NHS England Complaint Case C-053109: Wigmore Medical Centre & Medway Community Mental Health Team
To
Queens Bench Division
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
By Email: qbcaseman@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
For the Duty Judge
Dear Sir
Please issue civil proceedings for damages as set out in the email below and with immediate effect against the National Health Service as a satisfactory response has not been forthcoming.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Friday, 27 May 2016, 10:37, Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
To
NHS England
Dear Sir
1. Please be advised that NHS England was referred to the Court of Appeal (at the Royal Courts of Justice, London) for contempt of court with particular reference to an interference by the Medway Community Mental Health Team during your long delay in the processing of my complaint C-053109 and to which I have still not received your complaint report.
2. Please confirm that no complaint report on C-053109 will be issued by NHS England.
3. Please also send me your official postal address for court proceedings for damages that I intend to pursue against the NHS if I do not receive a satisfactory reply to this email.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
Reply Reply to All Forward More
On 2 June morning a reply came from Queens Bench on the ME002953 thread:
Claim No ME002953 proceedings (10)
Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>
To
2 June 2016 at 13:45
To
Case Progression
Queens Bench Division
Dear Sir
1. I have checked with Medway County Court who seemingly acknowledge, from lack of a reply to this email, that the Court has lost all track of these proceedings.
2. As such I wish to new High Court Case number to be assigned immediately.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Thursday, 2 June 2016, 13:28, Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Madam
It is not my fault that your system is faulty.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Thursday, 2 June 2016, 13:26, "Medway County, Enquiries" <enquiries@medway.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
Good Afternoon,
Which decision, the case number provided does not come up on our system.
Regards,
Miss Nic Gibson Civil & Enforcement Section Medway County Court Anchorage House 47-67 High Street Chatham Kent ME44DW T: 01634 887914 F: 01634 811332
Please note that I am not the direct administrator for your case and will not answer queries unless they are made through the enquires mailbox enquiries@medway.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk
From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 02 June 2016 13:19 To: Medway County , Enquiries Subject: Re: Claim No ME002953 proceedings
Dear Madam
I wish to appeal against this decision of the Judge.
Yours sincererly
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Thursday, 2 June 2016, 12:52, " Medway County , Enquiries " <enquiries@medway.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr Panigrahi,
This case cannot be transferred to the Queens Bench as there are no proceedings issued. Please forward a copy of the claim form and fee remission you have sent into the court as I cannot trace this on our system.
Regards,
Miss Nic Gibson Civil & Enforcement Section Medway County Court Anchorage House 47-67 High Street Chatham Kent ME44DW T: 01634 887914 F: 01634 811332
Please note that I am not the direct administrator for your case and will not answer queries unless they are made through the enquires mailbox enquiries@medway.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk
From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 02 June 2016 12:11 To: Medway County , Enquiries Subject: Fw: Claim No ME002953 proceedings
To
The Court Manager
Medway County Court
Dear Sir
Kindly arrange for this Case to be placed before a Judge for a decision as required by the Queens Bench Division of the High Court.
Thank you
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Thursday, 2 June 2016, 9:21, QB Issue & Enquiries <QBEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your e-mail, the claim number that you have sent to us is not one that is recognised at the High Court. If this case is being transferred from another court we will need the file and an order from the Judge to confirm that the case can be transferred to the Queens Bench.
Kind Regards
D Harvey
Issues & Enquiries Room E07 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL In accordance with Practice Direction 5B - Electronic communication and filing we ask you to do the following when sending an e-mail message to the court: Clearly state the Court's action number, parties’ names and any dates relating to an up-coming hearing in the subject header. Provide a clear description of the contents in the body of the e-mail message. Please refrain from messages such as “Please see attached”. Please state what the attachment is, i.e. “Please see the attached Notice of Change/Please find enclosed our Defence for filing/Please forward this message and its enclosures to Master <name> for the hearing on <date> & <time>. Please copy your message to the relevant parties (if applicable). If you are submitting a document by email, sending duplicates by post/Gold fax is not permitted by Practice Direction 5b (8.1). In accordance with Practice Direction 3.3a, please do not submit documents which carry a payable fee; such e-mails will be deleted. E-mail must only consist of one attachment, maximum 10 pages. If you're unable to comply with these points or any other part of Practice Direction 5B - Electronic communication and filing, your message will not be dealt with.
From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 28 May 2016 07:37 To: QB Issue & Enquiries Subject: Claim No ME002953 proceedings
To
Case Progression
Queens Bench Division
Royal Courts of Justice
London
Dear Sir
Etc
Claim No ME002953 proceedings (11)
Medway County, Enquiries <enquiries@medway.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>
To
Today at 14:06
Dear Sir,
The Courts system is not faulty. The case number provided is incorrect or relates to a matter that is very old. You have put in several requests over the last few months and have not seen any claim forms t issue. Can you please provide the items you submitted.
Regards,
Miss Nic Gibson Civil & Enforcement Section Medway County Court Anchorage House 47-67 High Street Chatham Kent ME44DW T: 01634 887914 F: 01634 811332
Please note that I am not the direct administrator for your case and will not answer queries unless they are made through the enquires mailbox enquiries@medway.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk
From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 02 June 2016 13:29 To: Medway County , Enquiries Subject: Re: Claim No ME002953 proceedings
Dear Madam
It is not my fault that your system is faulty.
Etc
No High Court Case number came back from the Queens Bench Division as a replacement of ME002953. Either I did not have any kind of mental health problems that required treatment by the NHS or I had a mental disorder in which case I had to be on medical retirement. So I felt compelled to respond to the last email from the Medway County Court by restoring my ME010463 in this Court as follows:
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs The University of Greenwich: ME010463
Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>
To
2 June 2016 at 17:54
To
Miss Nic Gibson Civil & Enforcement Section Medway County Court Anchorage House 47-67 High Street Chatham Kent ME44DW T: 01634 887914 F: 01634 811332
Please note that I am not the direct administrator for your case and will not answer queries unless they are made through the enquires mailbox enquiries@medway.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk
Dear Miss Gibson
1. You wrote to me earlier today the following:
''You have put in several requests over the last few months and have not seen any claim forms t issue. Can you please provide the items you submitted.''
2. Looking at my records I made an application for Permission to Appeal out of time and Permission to Appeal the last decisions of Medway County Court on my Claim No ME010463 for which I submitted the Fee Remission Form by email. The Court was unable to trace this Claim Number so I heard nothing from you.
3. I would be grateful if you would please look again more carefully at your system. For reference I am drawing your attention to the General Form of Judgment or Order dated 8 December 2014 in Claim No ME010463 with regard to the full written reasons for the Order of 16 October 2014 from District Judge Wilkinson that stated: It is ordered that ‘The Court Order is quite clear, in the absence of any party at Court when the Claimant’s application had been listed for a hearing and the application being inmeritorious on its face in the absence of any further information the application was dismissed’.
3. The medical information concerning my medical retirement from the University of Greenwich is now fully available and I am ready to attend the next Hearing to put forward the evidence. So I am requesting you again to let me have the Court's Permission to Appeal these Orders and to let me know if the Case will require another Hearing or can be determined without a Hearing.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gilligham
Kent ME8 0SL
Reply Reply to All Forward More
On 3 June 2016 nothing was happening except for Thomas Jones planting cutting comments in my Blog, which needed to be negotiated because they affected the legal proceedings and were designed to get me exposed to attacks that I withstood, as follows:
Phands surfaces again to annoy
Yesterday evening at around 18.30 hours UK time I noted a comment posted by a person by the name of Phands who I reported to the UK Police for stalking harrassment on me over the internet, as follows:
Phands Phands@aol.com 176.126.252.12 Try spitting on it first. It’ll fit. Approve | Reply | Quick Edit | Edit | History | Spam | Trash Does homosexuality fit into Hinduism?View Post0No approved comments11 pending comment 2016/06/01 at 5:30 pm
New comment waiting approval on Shantanu Panigrahi’s Blog Phands commented on Does homosexuality fit into Hinduism? A gay (homosexual) person on Religious Forums delving into Hinduism and calling himself a Hindu asked for spiritual direction … Try spitting on it first. It’ll fit. Approve Trash | Mark as Spam More information about Phands URL: Email: Phands@aol.com Whois: http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/176.126.252.12 (IP: 176.126.252.12)
The blogpost into which this comment was lodged is at: https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2016/05/14/does-homosexuality-fit-into-hinduism/.
The following blogpost provides the information relating to Phand’s past activities concerning me: https://discussionforumfortruthseekers.wordpress.com/2013/02/12/harassing-comments-against-dr-shantanu-panigrahi-from-phands-and-a-nick-clegg-imposter-referred-back-to-kent-police-for-investigation/.
I trashed the comment immediately for its vulgarity that would destroy the tone of my postings on serious issues. However, this morning my thoughts are that the matter needs to be blogged if only to let the criminal authorities aware that internet stalking harrassment, if not taken seriously, only leads to the perpetrator getting more brave and continuing to make a nuisance of himself as well as being a source of annoyance to others who wish to use the internet to do positive things like generating real information that would benefit the world.
Perhaps Phands would like to comment on why he still finds it of interest to pursue me at my Blogsite. Maybe we should hear more from this character in this special blogpost that I have set up for him to enable his views to be known, given that the Police have taken no action against him.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
June 2, 2016 - Posted by shantanup | Uncategorized
6 Comments »
1. And how did trying to prosecute phands work out last time? Did you achieve anything?
Comment by Thomas Jones | June 3, 2016 | Reply
o I had asked the High Court to consider whether the Police and the Independent Police Complaints Commission had acted correctly according to the law, see here: https://discussionforumfortruthseekers.wordpress.com/2013/08/21/judicial-proceedings-against-kent-polices-and-independent-police-complaints-commisions-processing-of-internet-harassment-complaints/.
I heard nothing from the Court, so referred the matter to the processes of Parliamentary scrutiny of the court official concerned (see here: https://discussionforumfortruthseekers.wordpress.com/2014/02/01/misfeasance-in-public-office-at-the-royal-courts-of-justice-london/). Again nothing came out of that process.
With a criminal case I would have had the opportunity to seek Phands extradiction to the United Kingdom to face stalking harassment as criminal charge, which is why I pursued that option. There is the option to take out a civil case for stalking harassment, but I cannot go through the trouble and expense of finding out who Phands is (his real name), where he lives and if he can face UK justice from a personal civil action. As far as I recall he has refused to divulge these personal details to me.
I tried all I could. Now I am resigned to blogging the matter so that people around the world know about this kind of problem what that they have to do to deal with it.
I think it is an achievement to have produced concrete evidence of both the operation of criminal law in the UK and the system of justice that oversees it; the finding being that (for me at least) there was no legal oversight of internet harassment so it is unlikely that the common man should bother complaining when going about his/her lawful activities.
Comment by shantanup | June 3, 2016 | Reply
2. It did no such thing. It showed you were delusional for ever thinking this was a criminal matter. How did your doctors appointment go?
Comment by Thomas Jones | June 3, 2016 | Reply
o This is the wrong blogpost under which to discuss anything other than Phands and internet harassment issues as to who the UK Police take seriously when considering complaints from the public.
Comment by shantanup | June 3, 2016 | Reply
3. You don’t get to tell me what I can and can’t discuss.
Comment by Thomas Jones | June 3, 2016 | Reply
o Of course, I appreciate you are a free individual and entitled to discuss whatever you wish. But this is a Blog-Forum which has rules in order to maintain the structure of the Forum.
Comment by shantanup | June 3, 2016 | Reply
Thomas Jones then posted a comment under the UK State makes an appointment for Dr Shantanu Panigrahi to see to doctors instead of dealing with Court proceedings:
2 Comments »
1. So,l have they booked you a place in the funny-farm??
Comment by Thomas Jones | June 3, 2016 | Reply
o 1. The meeting of 17 May 2016 did take place at my home with my daughter attending and in my absence.
2. On 18 May morning I telephoned the number given to me in the letter and lodged the following complaint to Canada House where the Community Mental Health Team is located:
(a) On Monday 16 May 2016 I telephoned Canada House at around 10.45 am asking your Loren that my complaint against Gill Banister be dealt with properly. She said Ms Jane Adams would be dealing with this. I asked if I would get a phone call back the same day because she asked me for my telephone number which I gave and she said that she would mark it urgent. However, no phone calls came back that day or on 17 May 2016.
(b) When I had telephoned earlier at 10.16 am and spoke with Gill to cancel the appointment made by Gill Banister for me on 17 July 2016 at 12.30 pm she clearly told me that all those who needed to be informed of the cancellation would be informed. But this was not done. Further, no office email address would be given to me register my concerns.
(c) My complaint against Gill Banister is manifold: first, she sent me a letter of appointment out of the blue with no background information on what precipitated it so I have no idea what is on the agenda for the Meeting. Second, she gave me a wrong venue address of 3 Hoath Way for the Meeting as I informed Gill. Third, she did not provide me with her email address to reply back to. Fourth, she gave me next to no time to prepare for the meeting with only 1 working day before it was to take place. Fifth, she went on leave on that working day of Monday so as not have to talk to me about her letter to provide the clarifications that I needed so that I had no alternative but to write an email to Mrs Kelly Mills of Wigmore Medical Centre and the Mental Health Tribunal to find out what the legal position held. Sixth, she did not address me as Dr Shantanu Panigrahi but a Mr. Seventh, she did not include a Consultant Psychiatrist but a Speciality doctor Dr Emezie. Eight, she did not include Dr Sudhir Patel who is my GP for the meeting but her daughter Dr R Patel whom I have never met in my life so how can she be my GP?. Nine, She marked the letter Private and Confidential which my wife thoroughly objected to because she needs to be at the appointment as the instigator of complaints against me, and harassing me yesterday prompted by Dr Reema Patel to send me three text messages from her workplace.
3. No telephone calls or emails or letters in the post have come from the Medway Community Mental Health Team since I delivered the above complaint-submission, nor has anyone else visited me at my home. So I do not know what the Team is planning now.
Comment by shantanup | June 3, 2016 | Reply
So, once again, it has resulted in you making a silly complaint that will achieve nothing. I’m surprised you haven’t sensed the pattern here. What is your Daughters attitude? Does SHE think you need interventional help?
Comment by Thomas Jones | June 4, 2016 | Edit | Reply
· As should have been clear from what I wrote this matter was immediately reported to the Mental Health Tribunal under a Tribunal-approved Application Form to judge the legality of what the Medway Community Mental Health Team is doing, and until this judgement arrives with me I am not cooperating with any attempts by the Team to examine my mental health from the employment of its professional agents at Canada House or the doctors in GP Practices such as the Wigmore Medical Centre.