Correspondence with: Sam Morgan: on: CRD-2103-W1728YGQ
A snapshot of my Particulars of Claims for
(a) Defence against the repeated Judgments of the Central London County Court since January 2021 on Claim E35YM660
(b) The Judgement of Master Eastman at the Queens Bench of the High Court since Spring of 2018 on Claim HQ17X01773; and
(c) Refusal of the North Kent Magistrates Court to implement a private prosecution on the Crown Prosecution Service on the Arrest Warrant that I applied for;
are as follows:
(a) Claim E35YM660: I was asked by the first judge to submit a application notice to vary or set aside the Order dated 14 January 2020, which I did immediately I believe setting out the grounds that I had not received the Full Defence of the Defendant in that the Defendant refused to negotiate with me on the validity of the Claim against the then Prime Minister Mrs Theresa May. The Court did not reply to this application. In the meantime an organisation of sorts listed in the Claim Form as being named by persons unknown (Dr Sivaji Panesar, Ms Monneka Tahir, Fritz Wuehler, Professor Nitin Bhardwaj, Ed Mulhouse, etc) started intensively harassing, bullying, and intimidating me to pervert justice at this Court and at the Employment Tribunal at London South Employment Centre at Ashford where a Hearing was scheduled for 10 May to consider the Constructive Dismissal based on a mix of ageism and religionism, akin to how I was manipulated out of my scientific career at the University of Greenwich in 1998 which is listed for Defamation in Claim E35YM660 for stealing my severance payment of £55000, if the University wanted me out of the Institute where I worked.
So I got digressed into withstanding this aggressive victimisation from VOPA (Victims of Panigrahi Association) and because up to 50 law firms both mental health and civil ones had refused to take on my case of representation to the Central London County Court I had to abort the latest Hearing with His Honour HHJ Parfitt on 19 January 2021 at .00 am-10.15am for I felt vulnerable as no other Defendant was present on the Telephone Hearing so I felt that I was being set up by the Central London County Court to further terrorise me on top of all previous acts of erring in law-terrorism due to not having legal cover, or legal aid, the Department of Works and Pension Minister withholding my Personal Independence Payments since 2008. Not only did the organisation calling itself VOPA deliberately and unlawfully insert itself into these proceedings as an interested party that I objected to, it sent me ~1000 criminal anonymous emails directly or to my wife and associates such as Dr Odesanya of the Mental Health Institution and my Care Coordinator there, as well as to Yaw Abaogye at Sainsburys. This is why Sainsburys and the Employment Tribunal did not reply to the email I sent them last night. For they are all in this State-organised persecution together acting in concert with the backing of Kent Police and the rest of the Security Services of the United Kingdom such as M15, M16, as well as the Crown Prosecution Service and the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom with respect of its silence to my 5 September 2020 Appeal.
(b) Claim HQ17X01773: This Claim was initiated by me in the Spring of 2018 when all avenues to get legal redress from the abhorrent treatment that I received from the Mental Health Institutions both at the hospital in 2004 and again in 2008 as a political prisioner for forumulating the basis of my subsequent Foundation for World Development at Wordpress https://shantanup.wordpress.com (2010-2018) did not get the State authorities to get the University of Greenwich to pay me £55000 or £10,000 per year on medical retirement if indeed I was mentally disturbed with paranoid schizophrenia and persistent delusional disorder as Dr Masoud Dr Sudhir Patel and Dr Mathews at the hospital, and now Dr Odesanya contends, nor did the Employment Tribunal award substantial damages to me for unlawful and Constructive Dismissal by Shell UK for setting my the Union of Petrol Station Workers, the TUPE arrangements being flouted repeatedly from 2008-2015. Further, the Labour Party perpetrated racial discrimination towards me in considering my application for standing as an MP and submitting Motions to its Annual General Meeting, and lately it is the Liberal Democrats which have done that. Finally, West Yorkshire Police and North Yorkshire Police harassed me to set me up for criminal charges in the same way that Kent Police had set me up for a Speeding Fine earlier on and all attempts to have Kent Police answer to the Independent Office for Police Conduct were thwarted by internal institutional arrangements. The Case against Kent Police was also against the Legal Ombudsman and the Solicitor Regulation Authority effectively as also the Bar Standards Board and the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution. Master Eastman did not permit this appeal and Master David Jenkins covered up the matter, which was also reported to Kent Police for investigation, as was the criminal conduct of Consultant Psychiatrist Dr Odesanya for bypassing a clear indication from a questionnaire assessment that I had autism rather than mental illness that required anti-psychotic, anti-depressant and mood-stabilising medications. The Queens Bench may have behind the scenes awarded Costs against me to Kent Police as Inbrief solicitor Lucy told me when I contacted the Director of Public Prosecutions.
(c) The private prosecution as a counter prosecution is already submitted to you in the Summons Document APPLICATION FOR ARREST....', but if you require further information, I will be pleased to upload it again.
Message sent 16.07 pm hours 18 March 2021
Back to account
with: Sam Morgan
When are you able to speak?
I will need the following documents
Particulars of claim, defence, order listing your hearing.
If you can send to my email address
Sam Morgan @ 15 Mar 10:04
Left a comment:
Dear Shantanu, I will need the following documents Particulars of claim, defence, order listing your hearing. If you can send to my email address firstname.lastname@example.org thanks
New message re: Shantanu Panigrahi re: CRD-2103-W1728YGQ
15:22 (47 minutes ago)
to Shanpanigrahi3000, Own, me, Shantanu
Sent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message --------
From: Clerksroom Direct <email@example.com>
Date: 18/03/2021 12:42 (GMT+00:00)
To: Shantanu Panigrahi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: New message re: Shantanu Panigrahi re: CRD-2103-W1728YGQ
New message re: Shantanu Panigrahi re: CRD-2103-W1728YGQ
You have received a new message from Sam Morgan regarding your case CRD-2103-W1728YGQ:
Sam Morgan @ 15 Mar 10:04 Left a comment: Dear Shantanu, I will need the following documents Particulars of claim, defence, order listing your hearing. If you can send to my email address email@example.com thanks
Reply to Message
Clerksroom Direct firstname.lastname@example.org via sendgrid.net
15:25 (45 minutes ago)
Please click the following link to complete the password reset process.
Please note this link expires after 2 hours, after which you will no longer be able to use it to reset your password.
Clerksroom Direct will recommend suitable barristers for your case however responsibility for choosing which barrister to instruct lies entirely with you. Instructing a barrister is no guarantee that you will win your case. The barrister will give you their independent opinion on your case (if instructed to do so) which might be different from yours. Clerksroom Direct staff are not legally qualified and cannot offer any legal advice. It is your responsibility to provide copies of all paperwork that the barrister will need to fulfil your instructions. You should aim to provide a hard copy (not original documents) of your case papers where possible. Documents sent to us electronically must be limited to a maximum of 5 separate attachments. If it is necessary for your barrister to print papers received electronically you will be charged printing costs. If you wish to have any paperwork returned to you in hard copy at the conclusion of your instructions you will be responsible for meeting the postage/packaging costs. The barrister is only instructed to deal with the work described in the Client Care Letter. Fees paid to Clerksroom Direct are non-refundable. Please note the Client Care Letter is an agreement between you and the barrister you instruct, not Clerksroom Direct.
Please note: This email message is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. It is confidential and may also be protected by legal professional privilege. If you have received it in error, please notify me immediately and permanently delete this email and any attachments. Unless you are the intended receiver of this message YOU MUST NOT FORWARD, PRINT, DISCLOSE, COPY, USE OR RETAIN this message, any attachments or any part of it. It is the recipient's responsibility to take such steps as it deems appropriate to scan received messages and any attachments for viruses. No responsibility is accepted for viruses.
© 2021 Clerksroom Direct. All rights reserved.