Search

Correspondence with the International Criminal Court


The following correspondence has taken place with the International Criminal Court:

ICC Jurisdiction over the Queen of the United Kingdom for organising persecution of Dr Shantanu Panigrahi (3) Shan Panigrahi To OTP InformationDesk 26 August 2016 at 15:39 To The OTP Information Desk International Criminal Court.

Dear Sir

1. Thank you for your reply to my continued application to the International Criminal Court to order that the Queen of the United Kingdom be now examined for organising the State-persecution on me as a crime against humanity.

2. In this regard, kindly refer to International Criminal Court’s letter to me of 18 June 2004 in which you indicated that some of the matters that I had submitted then were outside the jurisdiction of the court but that this may be reconsidered in the future. I assumed that these were due to the Iraq war references made in the two-fold application.

3. In accordance with your expressed views then I narrowed the scope of my Claim to limit it to only the crime against humanity that affected me in person within the United Kingdom by the deliberate actions of the State of the United Kingdom. Further, in my earlier submission I had erroneously concluded that Mr Anthony Blair was the Head of the United Kingdom State responsible for subjecting me to State-organised persecution in which the entire institutional mechanisms of the State were coordinated to suppress my attempts to live a peaceful and lawful life in the United Kingdom, to the extent that when this persecution was determined and relentless I sought asylum out of the United Kingdom. It was recently clarified to me that since the persecution took place over different Prime Ministerships of the United Kingdom, it was the Queen of the United Kingdom who was personally responsible for all the persecution that I suffered since I wrote to her for assistance and instead she stabbed me in the back by having me incarcerated in a mental hospital and subjecting me to a life time of falsely-diagnosed medical treatment. Most significantly, as Head of the Commonwealth she stopped the Indian Government acting positively on the attached asylum application (see email in document ToHighCommIndiaccSoumyaPanda15Feb2016.docx) thus consigning me to years of physical and mental suffering in the United Kingdom as I lived in poverty from the lack of judicial decisions to compensate me for the victimisation that its institutions and citizens perpetrated on me, which included Social Security Benefits.

4. I should therefore be grateful if you would consider these updates that I have provided and force Queen Elizabeth of the United Kingdom to answer the charge of State-organised persecution on me as a crime against humanity, and order the UK State to compensate me financially for the suffering that I have endured.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Friday, 26 August 2016, 14:25, OTP InformationDesk wrote:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for your message. Please note that the International Criminal Court has a very limited jurisdiction. The Court may only address the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes as defined by Articles 6 to 8 of the Rome Statute that have occurred after 2002, and can only exercise jurisdiction in the countries that have ratified it. For more information on the Court’s jurisdiction and the full text of the Rome Statute, please refer to page 2 of the attached document and our website as well as our address, http://www.icc-cpi.int. We encourage you to carefully review this information.

If, after your careful review, you still believe the ICC is the correct place for your case and would like to submit a claim to the Court, then please follow the directions for how to do so on page 1 of the attached document. If you decide to submit information, kindly use only this email address : otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int.

Kind regards,

OTP Information Desk International Criminal Court

Cher Madame / Monsieur ,

Je vous remercie de votre message. Veuillez noter que la compétence de la Cour Pénale Internationale est très limitée. En effet, elle ne peut connaître que du crime de génocide, de crimes contre l’humanité et de crimes de guerre, ainsi que définis aux articles 6, 7 et 8 du Statut de Rome, qui ont été commis après 2002. En outre, la Cour ne peut exercer sa compétence que pour les Etats qui ont ratifié le Statut de Rome.

Pour de plus amples informations au sujet de la compétence de la Cour et pour consulter le texte intégral du Statut de Rome, veuillez-vous rapporter à la page 2 du document joint et au site internet de la Cour, http://www.icc-cpi.int. Nous vous encourageons à lire attentivement ces informations.

Si, après avoir pris connaissance de ces informations, vous souhaitez présenter une plainte à la Cour, vous trouverez la marche à suivre à la page 1 du document joint.

Cordialement,

Bureau des informations et des éléments de preuve Bureau du Procureur Cour Pénale Internationale

From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 25 August 2016 12:23 To: OTP InformationDesk Subject: ICC Jurisdiction over the Queen of the United Kingdom for organising persecution of Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

To: Office of the Prosecutor Information and Evidence Unit Office of the Prosecutor Post Office Box 19519 2500 CM The Hague The Netherlands otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int Fax +31 70 515 8555

Dear Sir,

1.. Please let me know whether the Queen of the United Kingdom falls within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court for examination to answer the charges of State-organised persecution through the commandeering of its institutions mounted on me over the past 18 years that is described and updated in my Blog: https://shantanup.wordpress.com/ .

2. If the Case can be heard, please send me the official forms to complete immediately.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL

________________________________________

“This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the International Criminal Court. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized by the owner of the information to read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part hereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message and all copies hereof”

“Les informations contenues dans ce message peuvent être confidentielles ou soumises au secret professionnel et elles sont la propriété de la Cour pénale internationale. Ce message n’est destiné qu’à la personne à laquelle il est adressé. Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire voulu, le propriétaire des informations ne vous autorise pas à lire, imprimer, copier, diffuser, distribuer ou utiliser ce message, pas même en partie. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez prévenir l’expéditeur immédiatement et effacer ce message et toutes les copies qui en auraient été faites.”

• Download ToHighCommIndiaccSoumyaPanda15Feb2016 .docx Reply Reply to All Forward More Application for an injunction to stop the National Health Service Assessing My Mental Health Status (5) Shan Panigrahi To hc.office@hcilondon.in; gentleballads@yahoo.com 15 February 2016 at 9:25 AM To Shri. Ranjan Mathai High Commissioner High Commission of India, India House, Aldwych, London, WC2B 4NA

Telephone Numbers: 020 7836 8484 020 7632 3035 (after Office hours) Fax Number: 020 7836 4331 hc.office@hcilondon.in

Dear Sir

1. Please reconsider my application for asylum in India as a political detainee in the United Kingdom held at Her Majesty’s the Queen’s personal pleasure to be tortured through the State’s NHS medication/ECT indefinitely without any access to the due process of the law.

2. I need to go to India immediately and have confirmed my family accommodation in A13/3 Kalindi Housing Estate, Kolkata.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL

Hide original message On Monday, 15 February 2016, 8:37, Shan Panigrahi wrote:

To Queens Bench Division Royal Courts of Justice

15 February 2016

Dear Sir/Madam

Please let me know the outcome of this application for an injunction.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

cc Mr Michael Dodds, Maidstone Magistrates Court on my private prosecution proceedings.

On Sunday, 14 February 2016, 7:45, Shan Panigrahi wrote:

To Queens Bench Division Royal Courts of Justice Strand London

By Email: qbcaseman@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

For the Duty Judge in attendance on Sunday 14 February 2016

Dear Sir/Madam

1. Until Kent Police’s Crime Report on Incident No 08-0943 against the National Health Service in its perpetration of criminality against me since 2004 is made available to me and has been judicially scrutinised (for factual accuracy and soundness of judgement) through a Judicial Review in the Administrative Court of the Royal Courts of Justice, I do not agree to being subjected to further rounds of assessment and treatment by the National Health Service through its doctors either in the General Practice or in the Hospital environment on my mental health for it would amount to a continuation of the criminality perpetrated.

2. As such I am hereby seeking an immediate injunction from the Duty Judge today to stop any further NHS reviews of my mental health pending the outcome of this Judicial Review.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL

Reply Reply to All Forward More

.

August 26, 2016Posted by shantanup | Uncategorized | 9 Comments

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Information Received - Review Letter - OTP-CR-76/22 Inbox from: OTP InformationDesk <OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int> to: "shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com" <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> date:

Your Reference: 22/444/CM/PCC Yahoo / Sent Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com> To: civil.claims@kent.pnn.police.uk Tue, 10 May at 20:22 To Civil Claim Officers Thank you for this morning'