Search

Progress of N1 Claim Form through Queens Bench Division of the High Court


The following Claim form was processed at the Queens Bench Division of the High Court:

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police (2) Shan Panigrahi To QB Issue & Enquiries 11 May 2017 at 12:45

To Queens Bench Issue and Enquiries

Dear Sir/Madam

If I do not receive a reply from you today by email concerning the attached N1Claim Form and Fee Remission Form that I submitted by email on 28 April 2017, I will terminate this application and blog the correspondence that we have had as a closure on the matter.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL

• 2 Attachments • View all • Download all • Download FeeRemisionKentPolice .pdf • Download N1 Claim Form Submitted 28April2017 .docx Reply Reply to All Forward More

The N1 Claim Form had the following details:

N1 Claim Form

Claimant(s) name and address including postcode: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL

Defendants name and address: Kent Police Grugeon House, Police Headquarters, Sutton Road, Maidstone Kent ME15 9BZ

Brief details of Claim: This Claim is for compensation and damages suffered by me as the Claimant as a result of Kent Police’s inaction and actions that has caused me much suffering since 2004.

Value: £50,000+ up to £5 million.

Amount Claimed: £50,000+ up to £5 million

Court Fee: £2250

Fee Remission/Exemption Form: to follow

Does or will your claim include any issues under the Human Rights Act: Yes. Particulars of Claim: This Claim is brought to the High Court against Kent Police and co-conspirators (officials in Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service, Lawyers, the Legal Ombdusman and the Independent Police Complaints Commission) against the following chargesheet against this Police Force: (a) protecting criminals on my submission of Internet Complaint hate crime; (b) protecting criminals on the Shell Tribunal matter; (c) protecting criminals in the UKIP proceedings matter; (d) protecting criminals in the Greenwich Legalities matter; (e) protecting criminals in the National Health Service directed crimes against me; (f) protecting criminals in the AuthorhouseUK book publication matter; (g) protecting the Legal Ombudsman from criminal activities against me with regard to several lawyers that I complained about; (h) Dover capture by Kent Police in 2004 to incarcerate me in a mental hospital without due reason; (i) capturing me at home and under handcuffs returning me to the mental hospital from where I had lawfully absconded; (j) pointless prosecution of speeding offence that I was collecting money to discharge in January 2017. (k) protecting court officials who gave me an unjustified criminal record with the processing of the speeding offence at Medway Magistrates Court. (l) protecting the Labour Party in its hate crime of denying me my membership rights to submit Motions, and Questions to the Prime Minister.

Statement of Truth I believe that the facts stated in these particulars of claim are true.

Litigation by: Claimant Dr Shantanu Panigrahi (Signed)

11 May 2017 9.00 pm Update:

I received a reply from the Fees Office of the High Court and replied as follows:

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police (4)

Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To

Hussain, Nadia

11 May 2017 at 18:29

Dear Ms Hussain

I have now formally terminated these proceedings because I was not allocated a Claim Number/Case Number by the Court for the contents of the N1 Claim Form that I submitted.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Thursday, 11 May 2017, 16:59, “Hussain, Nadia” <Nadia.Hussain@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Mr Panigrahi,

The Fees Office did not receive an email from you on 28 April 2017.

We cannot process a fee remission application without a signature. You are required to sign the EX160 and send this to us. The form you have completed is now outdated and no longer accepted. Please complete the attached form and return this to us, making sure it is signed and dated.

Regards,

Nadia Hussain

From: QB Issue & Enquiries Sent: 11 May 2017 12:50 To: Fees (RCJ) Subject: FW: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police

From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 11 May 2017 12:46 To: QB Issue & Enquiries Subject: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police

To

Queens Bench Issue and Enquiries

Dear Sir/Madam

If I do not receive a reply from you today by email concerning the attached N1Claim Form and Fee Remission Form that I submitted by email on 28 April 2017, I will terminate this application and blog the correspondence that we have had as a closure on the matter.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

Reply Reply to All Forward More

13 May 2017 Update:

I received a reply from the Fees Office and the following correspondence took place:

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police (10)

Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To

Hussain, Nadia

12 May 2017 at 18:38

Dear Ms Hussain

Please check the attached letter entitled ‘ToFeesOfficRCJ12May2017.docx’, and confirm to me that the Claim Number will now be issued.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Friday, 12 May 2017, 14:25, “Hussain, Nadia” <Nadia.Hussain@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

The alternative option would be to write a letter explaining the circumstances and making sure it is signed and dated.

From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 12 May 2017 13:31 To: Hussain, Nadia Subject: Re: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police

Dear Ms Hussain

I am not prepared to enter 0 in the partners section as it would amount to a false declaration when I estimate that my wife earns around £25,000 per annum. I will therefore not send the Fee Remission Form in the post as you suggest.

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Friday, 12 May 2017, 10:34, “Hussain, Nadia” <Nadia.Hussain@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

The completed form seems fine, but just to avoid issues you may enter 0 in the partners section as well.

Fees Office – Room E01

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London

WC2A 2LL

Regards,

Nadia Hussain

From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 12 May 2017 10:29 To: Hussain, Nadia Subject: Re: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police

Dear Ms Hussain

1. Thank you for clarifying this matter.

2. Please find attached my Fee Remission Form (that you sent me) completed (EX160-HWFKentPolice.pdf) except for where it asks for my Partners income which I left blank because my wife refuses to discuss her personal finances with me and refuses to let me use this information in this Fee Remission Form. Please therefore advise me if the form is satisfactory before I send it as a hard copy that contains my signature.

3. Please let me have your Room Number and Full Postal address to send the Fee Remission Form to as a signed copy if the contents are acceptable and there are no other queries.

Thank you

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Friday, 12 May 2017, 9:58, “Hussain, Nadia” <Nadia.Hussain@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Dr Panigrahi,

The court will only issue your claim and provide a claim number once they have the payment or fee remission. As the fee remission had not been completed/processed that is why you did not receive a claim number.

Regards,

Nadia Hussain

From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 11 May 2017 18:30 To: Hussain, Nadia Subject: Re: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police

Dear Ms Hussain

The ToFeesOfficRCJ12May2017.docx that I sent the Fees Office was as follows:

To

Fees Office-Room E01

The Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London WC2A 2LL

12 May 2017

For the attention of Ms Nadia Hussain

1.Thank you for your email to me sent on 12 May 2017 14.25 hours concerning the Fee Remission Form that I have submitted to the Court by email and the clarification of my partners income provided in that correspondence.

2. You say that instead of sending the Fee Remission Form by post in view of the issue that I mentioned I could take the alternative option of writing a letter to you to explain the circumstances and the letter should be signed and dated. This is the purpose of this letter.

3. I have been married since 1985 but my wife and I lead completely separate and independent lifes. I have only had brief periods of employment during the past 18 years some of which were parttime. Currently I am unemployed and am dependent on my wife’s charity to survive. My wife has been the sole earner and all the savings we have some in joint accounts belong to her. She does not share her earnings with me but has been my carer in light of the fact that I have been a psychiatric patient during these 18 years according to the National Health Service suffering from persistent delusional disorder for which I have been forcibly put on respiridone medication of 3 mg per day. She therefore feeds and clothes me and all the family property including the house and contents belong to her because I have not been able to pay towards the maintenance of these assets.

4. As I wrote to you my wife may be earning in the region of £25,000 per annum but will not tell me what she earns. I have no savings of my own, and she gives me pocket money for minor expenditures. I will start getting my Pension from August 2017 so my financial circumstances will change.

5. I trust that accordingly, you will consider my application of 100 per cent Fee Remission sympathetically and assign the Claim Number to my N1 Claim Form without further delay.

6. A hard copy of this letter signed by me will be posted upon your acknowledgement that this is what you require still.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

(Signed)

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

16 May 2017 Update:

The following additional correspondence took place:

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police (16)

Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To

Hussain, Nadia

15 May 2017 at 15:10

Dear Ms Hussain

It may be worth bearing in mind for legal purposes postal services are not reliable even though I have marked the envelope for your particular attention. The reason for urgency is that issue (l) of the Claim Form requires an immediate judgement because I am challenging the selection of the candidate who has been selected to represent Labour Party at this general election.

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Monday, 15 May 2017, 14:19, “Hussain, Nadia” <Nadia.Hussain@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dr Panigrahi,

The issuing office require the original signed claim form to issue. When we receive the paperwork we will process the Help with Fees application and pass the claim to the issuing office to issue.

Regards,

Nadia Hussain

From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 15 May 2017 13:41 To: Hussain, Nadia Subject: Re: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police

Dear Ms Hussain

1. As you required, I have posted by first class Recorded Delivery the attached three documents each of which was signed. The Royal Mail Barcode Number is GK250431159GB. As you will note from the Claim Form I have Claimed £100,000.

2. Can the Claim Number be issued now by emailing it to me on this basis?

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi On Monday, 15 May 2017, 12:46, “Hussain, Nadia” <Nadia.Hussain@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dr Panigrahi,

I have attached the N1 Claim Form you need to complete.

Please note, if you are claiming less than £100,000 you may be required to issue the claim at the County Court.

Regards,

Nadia Hussain

From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 15 May 2017 12:39 To: Hussain, Nadia Subject: Re: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police

Dear Ms Hussain

Does the N1 Claim Form have to be on an official Ministry of Justice Form or will the existing one that I drafted in Word be acceptable if I just signed it?

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Monday, 15 May 2017, 9:52, “Hussain, Nadia” <Nadia.Hussain@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dr Panigrahi, As mentioned before you need to send the signed EX160 Help with Fees application form by post with your N1 Claim Form. Once i receive all that in the post i can process the application. We need to have original signed paperwork.

Regards,

Nadia Hussain

18 May 2017 6.00pm Update:

The following fresh email communications took place:

Result of application for 100% Fee Remission (Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police) (6)

Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To

Hussain, Nadia

17 May 2017 at 13:03

Dear Ms Hussain

It is a pity that one full day got wasted at the messenger service of the Royal Courts of Justice when I wanted the Judge to order the Labour Party to initiate a reselection process immediately to see if Mr Andy Stamp should be replaced as the candidate in my Constituency Labour Party at this general election.

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Wednesday, 17 May 2017, 12:43, “Hussain, Nadia” <Nadia.Hussain@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Mr Panigrahi,

We have received your application at the Fees Office today.

Regards,

Nadia Hussain

From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 17 May 2017 12:35 To: Hussain, Nadia Subject: Re: Result of application for 100% Fee Remission (Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police)

Dear Ms Hussain

It would appear that SUE signed for the envelope delivered by the postman at 7.54 am on 16 May 2017 and on seeing your name on the envelope she would have been required to bring the letter straight to you seeing that it was sent by firstclass postage. The messenger service of Royal Courts of Justice clearly has failed if you have still not received my envelope.

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Wednesday, 17 May 2017, 9:26, “Hussain, Nadia” <Nadia.Hussain@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dr Panigrahi,

Processes take time here, although your application/papers were received this is a very big building, it will take time for the application to make it to the division. After which it takes a couple of days for the remission to be processed and then the claim issued as we have a lot of workload so it cannot be done on the day. So please bear with us.

Regards,

Nadia Hussain

From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 17 May 2017 08:36 To: Hussain, Nadia Cc: QB Issue & Enquiries Subject: Result of application for 100% Fee Remission (Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Kent Police)

To

Fees Section

Royal Courts of Justice

London

For the attention of Ms Nadia Hussain

By email: nadia.hussain@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Dear Ms Hussain

1. Please find attached the Royal Mail Track and Trace evidence that my item of mail containing three signed application documents that I sent to you by email also (namely, EX160-HWFKentPolice .pdf; n1-engClaimFormKentPolice .pdf;ToFeesOfficeRCJ12May2017 .docx) was delivered yesterday morning to you supposedly as addressed on the envelope that was marked for your attention.

2. Since I did not receive an acknowledgement of receipt yesterday of the documents nor any word from the Queens Bench Issue Section on the Claim Number that was necessary despite the immediacy of urgency indicated by my email of 15 May 2017 3.10 pm to you, I am left wondering whether the applied for 100% Fee Remission has not been granted by the relevant Section of the Royal Courts of Justice.

3. If this is the Case, please let me know the level of Judge engaged in this decision and whether there is scope for me to appeal to the Admininstrative Court on the grounds stated in my 12 May 2017 letter that I am penniless with no source of income living on charity of my wife as a self-imposed carer because she truly believes that I am mentally ill as the NHS insists.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________

26 May 2017 Update:

The following correspondence took place after my Fee Remission was approved and a Claim Number issued:

Progress in Case of Claim Number HQ17X01773 (10)

Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To

QB Issue & Enquiries

26 May 2017 at 19:33

Dear N Debrah

You will note from my previous communications with the Court that there are five respondents on whom the Claim Form needs to be served. So far the Claim Form has not been served on any one of them. It is for this reason that I cannot complete the certificate of service.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Friday, 26 May 2017, 17:15, QB Issue & Enquiries <QBEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Dr Shantanu Panigrahi,

Please be advised submitting a certificate of service is a prerequisite for receiving a Judgment in default. You may not receive Judgment without filing one.

Regards,

N Debrah

Administrative Officer

QB Issues & Enquiries | Queen’s Bench Division | HMCTS | Royal Courts of Justice | Strand, London | WC2A 2LL

Phone: 020 7947 7772

Web: www.gov.uk/hmcts

From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 26 May 2017 12:18 To: QB Issue & Enquiries Subject: Re: Progress in Case of Claim Number HQ17X01773

Dear N Debrah

I am not in a position to complete and submit a certificate of service to the Court.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Friday, 26 May 2017, 11:41, QB Issue & Enquiries <QBEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Dr Shantanu Panigrahi,

Thank you for your e-mail before your request for judgment can be considered you must complete and submit a certificate of service https://formfinder.hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/n215-eng.pdf

This is to certify to the court you have served the documents on the Defendant. Please be advised the Defendant has 14 days from the date of service of the Particulars of Claim to respond to the Claim.

Regards,

N Debrah

Administrative Officer

QB Issues & Enquiries | Queen’s Bench Division | HMCTS | Royal Courts of Justice | Strand, London | WC2A 2LL

Phone: 020 7947 7772

Web: www.gov.uk/hmcts

From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: 25 May 2017 12:39 To: QB Issue & Enquiries Subject: Fw: Progress in Case of Claim Number HQ17X01773

To

Queens Bench Issue and Enquiries

Dear Sir/Madam

1. I have now received three documents that were sent by the Court to my home address in the post as follows:

(a) Notice of Issue (unspecified amount)

(b) Claimant’s copy of Claim Form

(c) Defendant’s copy of Claim Form

2. Yesterday, at 11.21 am I sent Kent Police a forwarding email of my correspondence with the Court which contained in it the ‘elaborated’ particulars of claim submitted to the Court at 10.02 am yesterdy morning.

3. Kent Police has not replied to me on the contents, so that the Claim has apparently gone undefended.

4. As such I now require judgement to be entered in my favour for the full £5 million pounds of damages and compensation unless there are reasons for the Court to withold judgement pending further investigations.

5. Accordingly, please send me the Notice of Issue for the Specified Amount of £5 million.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

On Thursday, 25 May 2017, 9:32, Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: