top of page
Search

RE: E35YM660 PROCEEDINGS TRANSFER TO MEDWAY COUNTY COURT2

RE: E35YM660 PROCEEDINGS TRANSFER TO MEDWAY COUNTY COURT2

Yahoo

/

Sent

Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To:

Enquiries Medway County, Central London DJSKEL, Enquiries Central London County

Tue, 19 Apr at 08:55

To

Medway County Court

The Central London County Court

Dear Sir


In this continuing quest to satisfy the need to know, I am drawn to the proceedings of the CCMCC that preceded Claim E35YM660 to try and determine whether Judges individually are independent of the State, the State being the government and its institutions including the Courts in which the Judges sit and pass their Judgments and Orders: https://www.theallurementofrealityinreview.com/post/fw-failure-to-get-an-injunction-to-stop-kent-police-investigating-me-for-offences-unknown-1


in pursing this line of thought perhaps I was mistaken in assuming that the United Kingdom is a governed by a Dictatorial Monarch to whom I had twice petitioned to intervene and this is urgent now that I am running out of money to make ends meet, with the University of Greenwich still not paying me my £55,000 severance payment and the Cabinet Office still not refunding me the £4170 that I had paid as the costs of the government in defending Claim E35YM660.


I would like to think that we in the United Kingdom do live to individual Judges Rulings, Directions and Judgments as being the best way to resolve disputes among citizens that does not bring in the Monarch of the day into affairs that would destabilise the State.


Accordingly, I would be grateful if you would clarify to me whether the Judgment as it stands this morning has the approval and explicit endorsement of a Judge in the Central London County Court to have overruled District Judge Lightman's Order dated 21 June 2021 as attached:

CentralLondonCountyCourtOrder21June2021 (District Judge Lightman)).pdf

CentralLondonCountyCourtOrderononE35YM660dated19January2021_receivedbyClaimantfirstat9.27amon22March2021.pdf


You many further consider the attached skeleton argument in the Appeal: DICTATORIAL MONARCH IN THE UNITED KINGDOM.pdf and POWER CORRUPTS.pdf.


I look forward to your reply as soon as possible.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Gillingham

Kemt

United Kingdom

07967789619


Download all attachments as a zip file

CentralLondonCountyCourtOrder 21 June 2021 (District Judge Lightman).pdf 783.5kB

CentralLondonCountyCourtOrderonE35YM660dated19January2021_receivedbyClaimantfirstat9.27amon22March2021-1.pdf 54.7kB

DICTATORIAL MONARCH IN THE UNITED KINGDOM-digital.pdf 1.1MB

POWER CORRUPTS-digital.pdf 399.9kB:


CentralLondonCountyCourtOrderonE35YM660dated19January2021_receivedbyClaimantfirstat9
.27amo
Download 27AMO • 56KB

CentralLondonCountyCourtOrder 21 June 2021 (District Judge Lightman)
.pdf
Download PDF • 802KB


DICTATORIAL MONARCH IN THE UNITED KINGDOM-digital
.pdf
Download PDF • 1.11MB

POWER CORRUPTS-digital
.pdf
Download PDF • 504KB


___________________________________________________________________

Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

To:

Shantanu Panigrahi


Tue, 19 Apr at 08:55


Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.

Thank You

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

2 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Information Received - Review Letter - OTP-CR-76/22

Information Received - Review Letter - OTP-CR-76/22 Inbox from: OTP InformationDesk <OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int> to: "shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com" <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> date:

Your Reference: 22/444/CM/PCC

Your Reference: 22/444/CM/PCC Yahoo / Sent Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com> To: civil.claims@kent.pnn.police.uk Tue, 10 May at 20:22 To Civil Claim Officers Thank you for this morning'

Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page