top of page

Repeated submission to the General Court of the European Union concerning my Greece visit

With regard to my correspondence with the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning my forthcoming visit to Greece unhindered (see: ), I sent the following email yesterday:

Your email of 4 February 2018 (3) Shan Panigrahi To GC Registry 23 Feb 2018 at 13:19

To Registry of the General Court of the European Union Rue du Fort Niedergrunewald L-2925 Luxumbourg

Dear Mr Coulon

I am sorry I have just realised that I should have sent you this email directly for the General Court of the European Union to consider.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL United Kingdom

On Wednesday, 21 February 2018, 12:53, Shan Panigrahi wrote: Dear Jan Inghelram

1. Thank you very much for clarifying this issue. My normal course as a Blogger when receiving a request like yours would be to make another separate and appropriate entry in my Blog referencing the offending section of the Blog so that my readers are able to know your position clearly in order to clarify the point that you have raised. This would be the normal thing for me to do as my Blog structure is rather too complicated to have to delete a section altogether without causing major disruption to how my readership assesses the contents. Please however confirm to me the precise Order of the General Court concerning this issue in that the Court requires me to remove all references to the 4 February 2018 email and I will take the appropriate action.

2. Incidentally, please note that I have not yet received the General Court’s judgement on the attached application email: ToGCRegistryGeneralCourt12Feb2018.docx. As specified in my application I must have the written judgment of the General Court before the end of March 2018, the sooner the better so that I can plan my travel to Greece knowing that I will be able to have a good holiday in Greece and also return to the United Kingdom unhindered by the UK State’s criminal persecution against me.

3. I am due to make an appointment to see my doctor Dr Sudhir Patel on the morning of Friday 23 February 2018 to discuss these issues, so please acknowledge receipt of this email immediately with your response to the above queries. Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL United Kingdom

On Wednesday, 21 February 2018, 11:32, Inghelram Jan wrote:

Dear Dr Panigrahi,

I acknowledge receipt of your email of 4 February 2018 which you have sent to the Registry of the General Court of the European Union.

In response to your email, I wish to indicate that neither the Registry of the General Court of the European Union nor any other service of the institution European Court of Justice of the European Union has sent the email which you quote under 1 of your email. No complaint has been made either to the UK Kent Police, with whom we do not have any contact.

Considering the above, I also kindly ask you to remove said email, as well as any reference thereto, from your blog.

Yours sincerely,

Jan Inghelram

Jan Inghelram Director Legal Adviser on Administrative Matters Court of Justice of the European Union Tel. : (+352) 4303 2461 E-mail : • Download ToGCRegistryGeneralCourt12Feb2018 .docx : Reply Reply to All Forward More

To Registry of the General Court of the European Union Rue du Fort Niedergrunewald L -2925 Luxembourg Shan Panigrahi To GC Registry

12 Feb 2018 at 15:08

Dear E Coulon

1. With regard to my application to the General Court for a judgment on whether I am free to travel to Greece under freedom of movement of European Union citizens and return back into the United Kingdom unhindered, I have received the following email from the UK State that is full of errors.

2. Further I received a copy of the second defence document that the UK State had sent you which I severely object to – see attached FrAnonymous(FahmidaEColon)10Feb2018.docx.

3. Please note that if I do not receive an acknowledgment from you of this email within the next 24 hours, I will assume that my application to the General Court is not being given due consideration by the Court and will terminate my correspondence accordingly by blogging this email.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL United Kingdom

On Sunday, 11 February 2018, 12:33, Anonymous wrote:

Shan(tanup?), Believing you can wave some documents at the border is naive even reckless. It will take months maybe years to resolve the issue of whether or not your renunciation of UK citizen-ship in 2015 is binding or not. At first glance it does not meet any stringent requirements, but the major complication is that you have communicated it to an agent of a foreign state (the equivalent of an ambassador with plenipotentiary powers) Mathai accompanied with wild claims of persecution and acts of criminality against you, none of which has been proven and further which you subsequently recanted thereby admitting you are unreliable and a fantasist or a liar. Is it possible you would spend this period in a detention centre? I cannot say one way or the other but it would not be unprecedented. You have published all of this and so denying it would be futile and merely add to your woes. Even if we disregard the more recent application for asylum in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as claimed by one M.K. Bakhri but at least partly denied by you, it looks serious. Even more recently there appears to be some connection with Botswana not inconsistent with applying for asylum there. Have you? Your denial re Pakistan appeared quite unconvincing. All this information has been conveyed to law-enforcement and border control authorities. I know because I have seen some of it. There may be worse material I have not seen. The decision is yours but if you do decide to travel abroad notwithstanding all of this would it not be prudent for you to make contingency plans in case you are denied entry? Only belatedly are you grasping that having vexed so many people in positions of authority and power, and your having narcissistically documented it to embarrass and humiliate them, has severe adverse potential consequences for you. Carry on regardless is an amusing title of a movie but may not be sound advice. Why have you neither a lawyer nor a dog? You have a family so why not put the material before them and heed their counsel? The first step should be to erase this blog. It could be locked later by judicial order making deletion impossible. Truly, Booth

• Download FrAnonymous(FahmidaECoulon)10Feb2018 .docx : Reply Reply to All Forward More

Strange Case of SHANTANY PANIGRAHI Anonymous To 10 Feb 2018 at 0:49

Dear Mr Coulon, My name is Fahmida and I am one of the many people being persecuted by this Shantany Panigrahi. He says I am ‘an agent of the British state’ but all I was doing was my job as a clerical worker for Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service. Now he is threatening us with being prosecuted by the Luxembourg (he calls it Luxumbourg) Court of the EU, your name is mentioned, as is also the email adddress of We don’t know whether or not you can assist but it is not fair that we can continue to be harassed by this madman. Care in the Community is not suitable for extreme dementia cases. Please can you do something to help, may be if you copied the correspondence to the policewoman at the above email. Kind regards, Fahmida Z DELETE FOR CONFIDENTIALITY Web: E-mails must only consist of one attachment, maximum 10 pages. In accordance with Practice Direction 5B – Electronic communication and filing we ask you to do the following when sending an e-mail message to the court: Clearly state the Court’s action number, parties’ names and any dates relating to an up-coming hearing in the subject header. Provide a clear description of the contents in the body of the e-mail message. Please refrain from messages such as “Please see attached”. Please state what the attachment is, i.e. “Please see the attached Notice of Change/Please find enclosed our Defence for filing/Please forward this message and its enclosures to Master for the hearing on & . Please copy your message to the relevant parties (if applicable). If you are submitting a document by email, sending duplicates by post/Gold fax is not permitted by Practice Direction 5b (8.1). In accordance with Practice Direction 3.3a, please do not submit documents which carry a payable fee; such e-mails will be deleted. If you’re unable to comply with these points or any other part of Practice Direction 5B – Electronic communication and filing, your message will not be dealt with. Reply Reply to All Forward More

Comments: There was again no acknowledgment of this email so I have to assume that the matter has now been concluded without resolution. This is most unsatisfactory.

February 24, 2018 Posted by shantanup | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Information Received - Review Letter - OTP-CR-76/22 Inbox from: OTP InformationDesk <> to: "" <> date: