With regard to the correspondence relating to the following matter: https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2018/01/09/clarification-for-my-travel-to-greece-sought-from-the-greek-embassy-in-london/, the UK has apparently been served the papers by the General Court of the European Union because I have just received the following email from an agent of the UK State anonymously:
copy for the prospective defendant People Nomen Nescio To shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk 3 Feb 2018 at 20:36 From: C. de Judicature To: GC.Registry@curia.europa.eu Subject: Shantanu Panigrahi Ref. D94-2331/17 M. E.Coulon, I read what is below at https://shantanup.wordpress.com Is your latest response not something of an over-reaction to a mentally-disturbed individual formally diagnosed with NPD and BPD? Surely it is simpler to wait until he is the Republic of Greece, and then let the mechanisms of justice perform their function. The de facto position is that after voluntarily relinquishing citizenship of the UK, his entry to Greece as a claimed EU citizen is prima facie fraudulent. The judiciary, prosecution service and police of our country have enough on their plate already. It is time for the Elliniki Astynomia to do their bit. Eadey, J. (The Elgin Marbles Trust)
From: Tribunal General de La Union Europea, CVRIA Luxembourg Date: 02/02/2018 By email: shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk Dear Sir The Registrar of the General Court acknowledges receipt of your emails of 31/01/2018 and 01/02/2018. The Registrar regrets to inform you that these further communications are apparently malicious, abusive and threatening, and that a formal complaint about you has been made to the UK Kent Police. Any reply you send to this office will be forwarded, unread, to the UK Kent Police. E. Coulon Registrar Registry of the General Court of the European Union Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald, L-2925 Luxembourg http://curia.europa.eu
From: Tribunal General de La Union Europea, CVRIA Luxembourg Date: 31/01/2018 By email: shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk Dear Sir The Registrar of the General Court acknowledges receipt of your emails of 27/01/2018 and 29/01/2018. Your attention is once again drawn to the fact that the General Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes between individuals (natural or legal persons) and institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union. However, the General Court does not have jurisdiction to review the decisions of national courts or tribunals, or to rule on the lawfulness of provisions, decisions or measures adopted by national authorities of a Member State. Nor does the General Court have jurisdiction to hear and determine actions brought against decisions taken by international bodies which are not within the institutional system of the European Union, such as the European Court of Human Rights. Furthermore, in order to bring an action that is within the jurisdiction of the General Court, the applicant must be represented by a lawyer authorised to practise in a Member State. An application which is not signed by a lawyer cannot be registered. Having regard to the above considerations, the Registrar regrets to inform you that the General Court can take no action on your letter. The Registrar also informs you that he reserves the right, at his discretion, no longer to reply to your letters having the same subject-matter in the absence of new facts. E. Coulon Registrar Registry of the General Court of the European Union Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald, L-2925 Luxembourg http://curia.europa.eu
From: Tribunal General de La Union Europea, CVRIA Luxembourg Date: 23/01/2018 By email: shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk Dear Sir The Registrar of the General Court acknowledges receipt of your email of 21/01/2018. Your attention is specifically drawn to the fact that the General Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes between individuals (natural or legal persons) and institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union. However, the General Court does not have jurisdiction to review the decisions of national courts or tribunals, or to rule on the lawfulness of provisions, decisions or measures adopted by national authorities of a Member State. Nor does the General Court have jurisdiction to hear and determine actions brought against decisions taken by international bodies which are not within the institutional system of the European Union, such as the European Court of Human Rights. Furthermore, in order to bring an action that is within the jurisdiction of the General Court, the applicant must be represented by a lawyer authorised to practise in a Member State. An application which is not signed by a lawyer cannot be registered. Having regard to the above considerations, the Registrar regrets to inform you that the General Court can take no action on your letter. E. Coulon Registrar Registry of the General Court of the European Union Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald, L-2925 Luxembourg http://curia.europa.euReply Reply to All Forward More
This defence must have been submitted in response to a further submission that I made to the General Court of the European Union today as follows:
My travel to Greece and back into the United Kingdom unhindered Shan Panigrahi To GC Registry 3 Feb 2018 at 12:42 To Registry of the General Court of the European Union Rue du Fort Niedergrunewald L-2925 Luxumbourg
Dear E Coulon
1. Please take note of the following correspondence in arriving at a judgment on my application to the General Court.
2. You have said in the past that the discretion to reply to my submissions on this Case would be with the Registrar. This is quite acceptable to me.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL United Kingdom
On Saturday, 3 February 2018, 12:24, Shan Panigrahi wrote: on Your letter dated 31 January 2018
To Mr David Jenkins Appeals Office
1. Thank you for your letter dated 31 January 2018 that I have just received.
2. I am disappointed that you will not consider the submission of my Appellants Notice now for I have good reasons for not having submitted it thus far.
3. As such you leave me with no alternative but to restore my application to the High Court to institute misconduct in public office against you as set out in the attached document entitled: AttachmenttoDavidJenkins3Feb2018.docx
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL United Kingdom
From Appeals Office HM Courts and Tribunals Service The Royal Courts of Justice Group High Court Appeals Office Room WG08 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL
To Dr S. Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL
Our Ref: CORRESPONDENCE/DJ
31 January 2018
Dear Sir
Re: PANIGRAHI (APP) V? (RES)
Thank you for your email dated 31 January 2018.
As previously informed to you in our letter dated 13 November 2017 you have not filed an Appellants Notice in this office so there is no appeal to proceed to a hearing.
Any further correspondence on this matter will neither be acknowledged or replied to.
Yours faithfully
D Jenkins Appeals Office
• Download AttachmenttoDavidJenkins3Feb2018 .docx : Reply Reply to All Forward More
Misconduct in Public Office: Investigation by Mr Justice Eadey Shan Panigrahi To Jenkins David (Appeal Court) 25 Jan 2018 at 12:35
To Mr David Jenkins
Dear Sir
1. I understand from a person (devi8) who I believed was acting as a spokesperson for the UK government at my website that Mr Justice Eadey who you report to is currently conducting an investigation of my accusation of gross misconduct in public office with regard to the processing of my High Court Claim No HQ17X01773 and its subsequent Appeal, as follows: https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2018/01/11/question-posed-has-there-already-been-a-judgment-rendered-in-this-civil-matter/#comments.
2. Please confirm that that this investigation is taking place.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL Reply Reply to All Forward More
Out of Office: Hellas (your copy) Jenkins, David (Appeal Court) To Shan Panigrahi 2 Feb 2018 at 9:58
I am not in the office until 2 February 2018 . Please contact the QB Appeals Office, phone no 0207 947 7516 during my absence thank you
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
Reply Reply to All Forward More
Relevant Website details: https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2018/01/09/clarification-for-my-travel-to-greece-sought-from-the-greek-embassy-in-london/
February 3, 2018 Posted by shantanup | Uncategorized | Leave a comment
State-organised persecution by the UK State
To
CC
4 Feb 2018 at 13:21
To
Registry of the General Court of the European Union
Rue du Fort Niedergrunewald
L-2925 Luxumbourg
Dear E Coulon
1. I received an anonymous email yesterday seemingly from an agent of the UK State that contained the following section:
From: Tribunal General de La Union Europea, CVRIA Luxembourg
Date: 02/02/2018
By email: shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk
Dear Sir
The Registrar of the General Court acknowledges receipt of your emails of 31/01/2018 and 01/02/2018.
The Registrar regrets to inform you that these further communications are apparently malicious, abusive and threatening, and that a formal complaint about you has been made to the UK Kent Police.
Any reply you send to this office will be forwarded, unread, to the UK Kent Police.
E. Coulon
Registrar
Registry of the General Court of the European Union
Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald, L-2925 Luxembourg
http://curia.europa.eu
2. I am aghast at what is written and wish to have the issue clarified from you. For the record, I did not send you any email on 01/02/2018, let alone sending you anything ever that was malicious, abusive or threatening in any way. Further I did not receive any email from you on 2/02/2018.
3. It would appear that this attribution has been engineered by the UK State against me in the most criminal manner imaginable. Please therefore review the matter immediately.
4. I am copying this to Kent Police to have the culprits brought to justice.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Automatic reply: State-organised persecution by the UK State
To
4 Feb 2018 at 13:21
Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office and will answer your email upon my return from 07/02/18.
Kind regards
Lee
This email and any other accompanying document(s) contain information from Kent Police and/or Essex Police, which is confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) or bodies to whom it is addressed. The content, including any subsequent replies, could be disclosable if relating to a criminal investigation or civil proceedings. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by contacting the sender or telephoning Kent Police on 01622 690690 or Essex Police on 01245 491491, as appropriate.
To progress matters in your High Court Claim No HQ17X01773 (2)
To
5 Feb 2018 at 9:09
Dear Sir
Kindly confirm the authenticity of this offer.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Monday, 5 February 2018, 3:37, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
Mr Panigrahi,
re High Court Claim No HQ17X01773 and subsequent appeals
There is a roadblock, largely brought about by your own errors and inappropriate communications, in your case.
To clear this roadblock, a facilitation fee is payable. That fee is £500. VAT is not currently applicable.
It may be paid by Paypal to the following email address: charles.calthrop@gmail.com
In return for this fee, the matter will be listed for hearing within one week of receipt and all steps to find a sympathetic judicial ear will be taken.
If you do not make the payment by February 15 2018, you may consider the offer withdrawn.
You must appreciate the sensitivity of this matter. No further correspondence will be entertained until the fee is paid.
Yours sincerely,
Mrs Gladwyn Iko Pereira
Room E.403
High Courts of Justice
Republic of Botswana
The Allurement of Reality in Three Volumes
To
5 Feb 2018 at 20:34
To
Dave Richards
Greenberry Publishing
Dear Dave
Volume 3 is now 461 pages, and there is more material to add. Please let me know what is the maximum number of pages that each Volume should be from Greenberry's point of view. I can finalise this now and start writing a Volume 4 that would contain the explanatory Notes on all three Volumes. What do you think of this idea?
Yours truly
Shan Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL