Search

Comment on Nation of Morons in a Police State


Asking for a preliminary Hearing by Judge Kurrein and forcing me to go to Appeal were clearly a way for the criminal judges to extract money unnecessarily from an applicant in terms of the Employment Tribunal Hearing Fee and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Lodgement Fee to prevent justice from being sought and to cover up their criminality. This is evident for the fact that my letter to the EAT was transmitted back to Judge Kurrein for him to release another document which again made no mention of the technicalities of the Case; whereas the TUPE evidence was such that this was a cut and dry open and shut case in my favour. This is why there was no point in pursuing the Appeal at EAT by paying the lodgement fee, and shows clearly how a nation of morons in the Police State is attained, whilst giving the morons through a facade of civility that there are all kinds of legal procedures to have their grievances heard as long as they pay the money to the privileged classes of solicitors and barristers who are part of the Judicial control of the people through the dictats of a secret and unaccountable Establishment that monitor and direct the judicial processes from behind the scenes.


There is no conceivable reason that the Legal Ombudsman, the Medway Magistrates, Kent Police, Hodge Jones and Allen, and ELS Legal would not write to me if they were acting independently as institutions with specific authority. The only answer is that their actions with regard to my communications were coordinated by a central body, who also manipulated the University of London in its release of the transcript document and instigated the Tanya comment in my Clearly blogpost to see if I would make the mistake of letting it go on display thereby giving Mr Kashif Irfan a chance to start court proceedings for defamation against me that he cannot now because the full year since the blogpost was created has passed and he did not reply to my emails asking for information to start the Case if he dared. Now it is too late for me to allow him that luxury for above all I must prevent a cover-up through further judicial considerations of any of my applications. It is the reason that I will not contact Olympia Publishers for it will give the court a chance to rule on the Case that was submitted against the Publishers for not publishing my book and then would lead to the contents being reexamined for cover–up and order to take down my Blog. I cannot risk that. The thumping of Egregious yesterday was necessitated because he was used to cover-up the criminalities in my website and was therefore threatening the Blog. This is evident from the fact that when the technicalities of the persecution was put up for his comment he shut up; and the judicial authorities are not giving me a chance to report him for extradition to face the charge of criminal stalking harassment on which the evidence contained in the Blog is overwhelming.


So the persecution on me was State-organised without a shadow of doubt by a secret body within the Establishment of the State of the United Kingdom. I intend to protect my Blog as my priority objective for which I will continue with this menial job for as long as necessary. For this evil has to be resisted by countering offensively through the Blog.


On 8 December 2015, Tanya replied to my email which racheted up the attack on Mr Kashif Irfan and enticed me to telephone her to discuss it in detail, which was a trap and I hit her back with why she had not answered the question that I had put to her. There was no reply. On 9 December 2015 morning with no other messages coming by email or at the Blog, it was clear that I had to take further action on this so forwarded the email to Hodge Jones and Allen seeking information, and then forwarded the entire thread of emails to the Employment Tribunal, as follows:


RE: Case 2302960/2014: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Clearly Business Solutions Limited; Temple Farm Limited; and Iain Flash Gordon Enterprises Ltd. (2)

People

Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To

LONDONSOUTHET

9 December 2015 at 8:15 AM

To

Employment Tribunals

South London

Dear Sir/Madam


1. Further to my emailed letter to you of 24 October 2015, 2.19 pm, please note that the legal advice I have sought leads me to request you for a fresh examination of this Case.


2. I should be grateful for your full written reasons by email, if this is not appropriate, in order that the appeal process at EAT may be reactivated.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi



On Wednesday, 9 December 2015, 7:41, Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:


Legal Assistance from Hodge Jones and Allen

To

Nigel Richardson | Partner | For Hodge Jones & Allen

Tel:

020 7874 8368


Fax:

020 7874 8306

Email:

nrichardson@hja.net

Web:

www.hja.net


Dear Sir


1. I have received the following information (see contents of forwarded email) concerning the Shell Tribunal Case from an unknown source that is refusing to provide me with clarification of her detailed involvement in this matter. I therefore do not know whether she is guilty of entrapment to get me to issue libellous remarks in my website on behalf of the respondent or other parties.


2. Please therefore let me have your final decision on whether Hodge Jones and Allen is now providing me with the legal assistance that I need or I will look to other means of attaining justice with regards to all my legally valid entitlements including the litigations pending at Medway County Court. This will include writing to the Employment Tribunal again seeking clarification of Judge HIldebrand's ruling by forwarding this email to him despite the ruling of Regional Judge Hildebrand that no further correspondence can be entertained.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi


On Tuesday, 8 December 2015, 13:21, Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:


Ms Cummins


I asked you to give me the dates and the petrol stations that you worked in for Mr Kashif Irfan, and when he left Clearly Business Solutions Limited to join Barclays?


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi


On Tuesday, 8 December 2015, 12:00, tanya Cummins <tanyastalk@outlook.com> wrote:


Hi. Yes I can give you as much info as you would like. I can also give you the name of another girl who was also screwed over. He had 10 people take him to court and they all won. He illegally employed his wife and used to resort staff to tears. My phone number is 07517 147427


Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 08:40:11 +0000 From: shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk To: Tanyastalk@outlook.com Subject: Your comment posted in my Blog

To

Tanya


Hi Tanya


1. I got your message as follows: The man-management of Clearly Business Solutions Limited for Shell (UK) by Mr Kashif IrfanView Post 2015/12/06 at 4:57 am: Tanya Tanyastalk@outlook.com 92.31.146.230

I was also employed by this rude thieving man. Customers and staff warned me about lash if but I laughed it off. He is the talk of most shell petrol stations and if I am not mistaken he is now working for Barclays. So if you bank with them, you may want to consider changing’.


2. I am interested in following this up. Could you give me the dates and the petrol stations that you worked in for Mr Kashif Irfan, and when he left Clearly Business Solutions Limited to join Barclays?


Thanks


Shantanu Panigrahi

Reply Reply to All Forward More



I telephoned Olympia Publishers to enquire what the situation was with regard to the publication of this book and when no communications from anywhere, sent the following email to the Publishers:


Book Publication: The Allurement of Reality (2)

People

Shan Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To

Olympia Publishers

Today at 1:31 PM

To

OLYMPIA PUBLISHERS 60 Cannon Street London EC4N 6NP United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)203 755 3166



For the attention of Me Aaron Carr



Dear Sir


1. I refer to my telephone call to your office this morning because the required 4 weeks had passed since the submission of my sample chapters of the book, 'The Allurement of Reality' and I had not heard about the result of your assessment.


2. You informed me that because I had corresponded with you about an 'Additional Chapter' that I had proposed to this book, you had delayed your assessment and that I should now be informed if you would proceed with its publication before the end of next week. When I asked if I should send you a copy of this Additional Chapter by email (attached herewith) you said that this was not necessary for your assessment.


3. I am disappointed that this vital chapter is being left out of your preliminary consideration.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi


3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom


· Download

AdditionalChaptertoAllurementofReality6Dec2015 .docx

Reply Reply to All Forward More

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Information Received - Review Letter - OTP-CR-76/22 Inbox from: OTP InformationDesk <OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int> to: "shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com" <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> date:

Your Reference: 22/444/CM/PCC Yahoo / Sent Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com> To: civil.claims@kent.pnn.police.uk Tue, 10 May at 20:22 To Civil Claim Officers Thank you for this morning'