Search

CRD-2103-W1728YGQ:

CRD-2103-W1728YGQ:


from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to: sam.morgan@clerksroomdirect.com,

ravi.patel@governmentlegal.gov.uk

date: 15 Mar 2021, 11:02

subject: CRD-2103-W1728YGQ:

mailed-by: gmail.comTo


Sam Morgan

Clerksroomdirect.com


Thank you for your email this morning received on my computer Email address at 0953 am hours (UK-Time) at Shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com on my Mobile phone asking me 'When I am able to speak?' but which did not seem to appear in my computer Gmail Account. In connection with this there was second email that arrived from Clerksroom on my Mobile Phone at 10.04 am hours this morning also from Clerksroom Direct CRD-2103-W1728YGQ, asking me 'Dear Shantanu, I need the following documents: Particulars of claim, defence, order listing your hearing. If you can send to my email address: sam.morgan@clerksroomdirect.com Thanks.


I would indeed be able to submit the Defence Particulars in defending the Judgment of His Honour Judge Parfitt at the Central London County Court on Claim No E35YM660, the Claim that I initiated in August 2018 against the Prime Minister of the day, Mrs Theresa May, now superceded by the next Prime Minister, Mr Boris Johnson whose government lawyer is Mr Ravi Patel (ravi.patel@governmentlegal.gov.uk).


The Hearing of this Claim last took place on 19 January 2021 between 10.00 am and 10.00 am from my point of view because I withdrew from that Hearing with Judge Parfitt, not having still been given access to the Court File on what the Defence was or is right up to this moment, but I have assumed that His Honour Judge Parfitt did consider the evidence submitted to him in its entirety before passing His Judgement Order, said by Pisa of the Civil and Family Law to have been despatched to me in the post on the 19 of January 2021 itself, but which has still not arrived on my desk this morning from the postman at Royal Mail.


I do not wish to engage in any further Appeals against the Order issued, but as I have let the Crown Prosecution Service know this morning I am going to defend against the Enforcement of any costs awarded against me by the Central London County Court with respect to my Claims HQ17X01773 at the Queens Bench Division of the High Court outstanding from Summer of 2018 against Kent Police, and on E35YM660 at the Central London County Court, based on the materials that I have uploaded in the Clerksroom Direct website through my application for legal representation.


With these Particulars of Defence, and I wish to apply for an Application Notice to be served against all Defendants and Respondents listed or unlisted in my correspondence with the Queens Bench Division of the High Court and the Central London County Court which supercede Claims ME010463, SO.......? and ME002953 at the Medway County Court over the past 22 years of litigation. I would also in my defence challenge the Judgment that I had abused the process of Court at the Medway County Court in progressing my Defamation Case from the Employment Tribunal at Ashford Hearing Centre against the University of Greenwich in the Claim for Racial Discrimination and Unfair and Constructive Dismissal, in that the Defamation of gross misconduct towards colleagues and senior management at the University was itself sufficient reason for initiating those proceedings in civil litigation through the Civil Courts, and in the Case of Kent Police, through the Criminal Court at North Kent Magistrates Court and Maidstone Crown Court as supervised necessarily in my 5 September 2021 dated Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom: see attached ToSupremeCourt5Sep2020.docx.


In answer to your second question, I am able to take a phone call from you know to see how we progress from here.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619


Attachments area:

ToSupremeCourt5Sep2020.docx:


Continuing State-organised harassment

(Mailteam@aol.co.uk)/Sent


AOL Service Update <shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk>

To:UKSC Registry

Sat, 5 Sep at 22:40

To

Supreme Court


Dear Sir


I am not clear whether the Master at the Court of Appeal has read my attached complaint on this Saturday against his deliberate deceitful misinterpretation of my Appeal in Case Number 2018/PI/11721 that I sought an explanation for in terms of Full Written Reasons for the progress of this Appeal as attached: ToCourtofAppealccSupremeCourt5Sep2020 but it would appear from the two additional bullying, intimidatory and harassing emails designed to pervert the course of justice that I have just received as attached Frindeed5Sep2020c.docx and FrExtinctionRebellion5Sep2020b.docx, that the Master concerned remains unapologetic for having misled me and the wider legal community.


Please identify the name of the Master responsible for this crime against humanity immediately, unless Her Majesty the Queen has voluntarily abdicated to avoid being summoned to the Court to explain her conduct over the past 20 years of monarchy that saw me being persecuted by the State and its overseas allied States for daring to retaliate at the monsters of the University of Greenwich, Shell UK, Sainsburys, Royal Mail, and the Mental Health authorities by publishing my discoveries on this unravelling of the British State in my Blog https://shantanup.wordpress.com.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619



ToCourtofAppealccSupremeCourt5Sep2020.docx

13.8kB

Frindeed5Sep2020c.docx

15.5kB


FrExtinctionRebellion5Sep2020b.docx

14kB:


CRD-2103-W1728YGQ:

Inbox

Shantanu Panigrahi

Attachments11:02 (58 minutes ago)

To Sam Morgan Clerksroomdirect.com Thank you for your email this morning received on my computer Email address at 0953 am hours (UK-Time) at Shanpanigrahi3000@g


from: Sam Morgan <sam.morgan@clerksroomdirect.com>

to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

cc: Sam Morgan <sam.morgan@clerksroomdirect.com>

date: 15 Mar 2021, 11:34

subject: Re: CRD-2103-W1728YGQ:

mailed-by: clerksroomdirect.com

Signed by: dkim.mimecast.org

security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

: Important mainly because it was sent directly to youDear Dr Panigrahi,


Thank you for your email.


Sadly, we are not able to assist.

This is outside of our expertise, you need someone who specialises in

this and can deal with many various issues and claims you might have.

You would almost certainly need a solicitor.

My best wishes go to you and your claim.


Warmest regards,


Please note: This email message is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. It is confidential and may also be protected by legal professional privilege. If you have received it in error, please notify me immediately and permanently delete this email and any attachments. Unless you are the intended receiver of this message YOU MUST NOT FORWARD, PRINT, DISCLOSE, COPY, USE OR RETAIN this message, any attachments or any part of it. It is the recipient's responsibility to take such steps as it deems appropriate to scan received messages and any attachments for viruses. No responsibility is accepted for viruses


Clerksroom Direct will recommend suitable barristers for your case however responsibility for choosing which barrister to instruct lies entirely with you. Instructing a barrister is no guarantee that you will win your case. The barrister will give you their independent opinion on your case (if instructed to do so) which might be different from yours. Clerksroom Direct staff are not legally qualified and cannot offer any legal advice. It is your responsibility to provide copies of all paperwork that the barrister will need to fulfil your instructions. You should aim to provide a hard copy (not original documents) of your case papers where possible. Documents sent to us electronically must be limited to a maximum of 5 separate attachments. If it is necessary for your barrister to print papers received electronically you will be charged printing costs. If you wish to have any paperwork returned to you in hard copy at the conclusion of your instructions you will be responsible for meeting the postage/packaging costs. The barrister is only instructed to deal with the work described in the Client Care Letter. Fees paid to Clerksroom Direct are non-refundable. Please note the Client Care Letter is an agreement between you and the barrister you instruct, not Clerksroom Direct.


5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Information Received - Review Letter - OTP-CR-76/22 Inbox from: OTP InformationDesk <OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int> to: "shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com" <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> date:

Your Reference: 22/444/CM/PCC Yahoo / Sent Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com> To: civil.claims@kent.pnn.police.uk Tue, 10 May at 20:22 To Civil Claim Officers Thank you for this morning'