With regard to the following appeal (https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2017/11/15/appeal-to-the-court-of-appeal-on-state-organised-persecution/), I submitted the following email to the Court of Appeal today:
Appeal without a Hearing Shan Panigrahi To Civil Appeals – Registry 14 Dec 2017 at 12:07
Dear Miss Farid
1. Thank you for your email of 12 December 2017 (below).
2. The only paper that I shall submit for my Appeal is the attached email from Kent Police received this morning which sums up the grounds for the Appeal in a bid to avoid duplication of existing paperwork.
3. Please let me know if this will be sufficient for a Judgement without a Hearing since the rest of the evidence is available from this Blog: https://shantanup.wordpress.com/.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL
On Tuesday, 12 December 2017, 9:42, Civil Appeals – Registry wrote:
We have not received any fee remissions for you from the fees office but please note that all papers should be sent together to our office, including your completed EX160.
Miss S Farid Court of Appeal, Registry, Room E307 | HMCTS | Royal Courts of Justice | Strand, London | WC2A 2LL Phone: 020 7947 7121 Web: http://www.gov.uk/hmcts Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
• Download FrLeeMeiles(KentPolice)14Dec2017 .docx Reply Reply to All Forward More
The FrLeeMeiles(KentPolice)14Dec2017.docx document was as follows:
[Shantanu Panigrahi’s Blog] Please moderate: “Application to Classify Dr Shantanu Panigrahi as a Vexatious Litigant by the Indian High Commission” (3) Lee NEILES DI 46010977 To ‘Shan Panigrahi’ 14 Dec 2017 at 9:57
Thank you for your email Dr. Panigrahi. I will pass this onto the relevant officers for their attention.
Lee Neiles Detective Inspector 10977 – IMU Crime Hub & PNC Bureau E-mail: email@example.comF Internal: 19-2075 | F External: (01622) 652075 |F Mobile: 07972004549| Address: Investigation Management Unit – Kent Police HQ, Sutton Road, Maidstone, ME15 9BZ*
From: Shan Panigrahi [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: 14 December 2017 09:27 To: Lee NEILES DI 46010977 Subject: Fw: [Shantanu Panigrahi’s Blog] Please moderate: “Application to Classify Dr Shantanu Panigrahi as a Vexatious Litigant by the Indian High Commission”
Dear Mr Neiles
1. Further to the crimes that I discussed with you by email I now refer you to the visit to our home yesterday at 11.30 pm by PC13753 and PC13686 . This visit from the Policemen lasted about 15 minutes during which my wife and I answered all the questions that were put to us seemingly to the satisfaction of the policemen. The Policemen would not say why this visit to our home was made necessary except to mention that there was something that I posted online. When I asked who reported me to the Police for this questioning they would not reply. I told them that they should have come through my solicitor.
2. If there are any further queries concerning this matter, please trace the apparent lawyer Cherie (see below) who has offered to help me with legal assistance. I have accepted her offer of pro bono legal representation.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL
On Friday, 8 December 2017, 0:05, WordPress wrote:
New comment waiting approval on Shantanu Panigrahi’s Blog
“Cherie” commented on Application to Classify Dr Shantanu Panigrahi as a Vexatious Litigant by the Indian High Commission The following correspondence took place: Application to Classify Dr Shantanu Panigrahi as a Vexatious Litigant by the … This interesting case history was passed on to me for a desk review. Nothing here comprises legal advice and should be treated as fiction. “as far as my recollection serves me I have never renounced UK nationality” – Dr Shantanu Panigrahi Come on, that is ridiculous claim, a preposterous one, I presume from your writing that you have some legal training or qualification, so you must surely see this: If one renounces citizenship, which is not the same as nationality, one would recall doing this. It is a very major step in one’s life. Reading carefully some of the material here, I believe you did renounce UK citizenship, and I even have the date you did it, however much you may now regret it or repent. This blog provides the evidence and you might be estopped (the doctrine of promissory estoppel) from denying it. You cannot “unrenounce” it, or claim some Court has “ratified” or “confirmed” or “validated” it. No Court has authority to do so, as there is no legislative framework for unrenouncing a renunciation. As you appear not to have citizenship of any other country, by doing so you made yourself stateless. It is against international law for a state to make someone stateless, but here it was your own free will actions, however ill-advised, which did so. The state is innocent of such an action. There is now a dilemma. As a non-citizen without a visa or other permit to be in the UK, but whose presence in the UK came about lawfully, you exist in a lacuna. However, from the comments sections, it would seem to be likely your enemies have kept the Home Office fully appraised of your folly pardon me for being blunt, and predicament. Accordingly, it may be best to be prudent about travelling abroad, to avoid any unpleasant surprise upon return. You could re-apply for UK citizenship by naturalisation, because as I read them the law does not require the qualifying period of residence in the UK to be anything more than legal. So even your period here while you were a UK citizen can count. There is, however, a residual problem, and that is that your renunciation of UK citizenship took place some time ago, so it could be argued that you do not meet the requirements to have a recent period of continuous (legal) presence. You may claim an ECHR right to family life to stay as a spouse of a UK citizen. Such an application may be made on a protective basis too, and made while you are here, lawfully or otherwise. Another avenue open to you is to establish that, on the balance of likelihood, you were insane at the time of the purported renunciation. That would make the renunciation void, i.e. as if it never happened at all. However, there are drawbacks to claiming to be mad or have been mad, with possibly severe consequences. I take it these communications from Pakistan or India are bogus and I do not understand why you gave the trolls such oxygen. What next, an acknowledgement from Buganda? In any event, there is no automatic reversion of citizenship to that of birth, though India may be legally or morally compelled to assist. I do not know anything about Indian law. I am not sure who can best advise or assist you. My affiliated chambers is by code of conduct prevented from helping due to the usual potential conflict of interest. Would you like me to ask around to see who might wish to take up cudgels on your behalf, on a pro bono basis? With a Conservative government in place, and cutbacks to CABs, that may be the best option for you, as you claim to be indigent. I wish you would not keep trying to rile the authorities, though, when your own position is so critically self-weakened. . . Save your mischief for later would seem wise. Do you own a dog? Approve Trash | Mark as Spam
More information about “Cherie” URL: Email: email@example.com Whois: http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/220.127.116.11 (IP: 18.104.22.168)
Thanks for flying with WordPress.com
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________ This email and any other accompanying document(s) contain information from Kent Police and/or Essex Police, which is confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) or bodies to whom it is addressed. The content, including any subsequent replies, could be disclosable if relating to a criminal investigation or civil proceedings. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by contacting the sender or telephoning Kent Police on 01622 690690 or Essex Police on 01245 491491, as appropriate. Reply Reply to All Forward More
15 December 2017 Update:
I received the following reply from the Court of Appeal today:
Appeal without a Hearing (2)
15 Dec 2017 at 10:40
Please note that your grounds of appeal need to be clearly headed.
Once you have filed your application and the matter has been set down, you will be allocated a case manager who will be able to advise you with regards to the transcript.
Miss S Farid
Court of Appeal, Registry, Room E307 | HMCTS| Royal Courts of Justice | Strand, London | WC2A 2LL Phone: 020 7947 7121 Web: www.gov.uk/hmcts
25 December 2017 Update:
(a) No reply was received to the following updating email sent to Kent Police:
Update on Investigation of Crimes
15 Dec 2017 at 12:26
Dear Mr Neiles
Thank you for your email of 14 December 2017, 9.57 am.
Please update me on the responses of the officers concerned with the investigation of Cherie that I brought to your attention.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Kent ME8 0SL
(b) The following update was provided to the Court of Appeal but no reply was received back from the Court:
CMP-069454 ABC:00481359 (2)
20 Dec 2017 at 10:53
Dear Mr Holloway
Are you not aware that this complaint was referred to the Legal Ombudsman by Kenan Mehmet of the City of London Police against the criminal activities of several actors in the legal profession including court officials, and is therefore not solely against solicitors that you are now referring to. The relevant Police Crime Report Number is CRONLINE 145922.
If Mr Mehmet made an error in referring this matter to you in that the Legal Ombudsman is not responsible for prescreening criminal activities in the legal profession for the Police, kindly inform me immediately so that I can take appropriate action in the Court of Appeal where my Appeal is pending.
I am copying this email to the Court of Appeal for the attention of the Case Manager assigned to my Case as required by the procedures outlined by Miss Farid on 15 December 2017 10.40 am by email.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
On Friday, 15 December 2017, 8:21, Enquiries <Enquiries@Legalombudsman.org.uk> wrote:
Dear Dr Panigrahi
In my previous email I provided full details of our scheme and our process regarding complaints.
The Legal Ombudsman has not made any investigation at this stage and cannot until you have complained to your solicitor. We will need to see a copy of your complaint and your solicitors response.
The Legal Ombudsman will only investigate issues of poor service. If you feel that there are issues that should be drawn to the attention of the police then you should make them aware directly. I note that your email has been copied in to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please refer to the documents in my previous email which explain our complaints process and how to complain about your solicitor.
Steve Holloway Assessor www.legalombudsman.org.uk
11 January 2018 Update:
These proceedings continued here: https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2018/01/11/question-posed-has-there-already-been-a-judgment-rendered-in-this-civil-matter/.
Appeal to the Court of Appeal on State-organised persecutionWith 2 comments